G
Guest
I have complained recently about Outlook's tendency to corrupt its own
navigation pane, usually resulting in the loss of the many folder shortcuts
I've arranged for my convenience and productivity. I think I know what part
of the problem is and I wonder what and when Microsoft will do something
about it.
When I shut down Outlook 2007 from either the file/exit menu or by clicking
the red "X" in Vista, the program appears to shut down. But it usually
remains active indefinitely as indicated by iits failure to disappear from
the Windows Task Manager.
What this suggests is that when Windows is shut down it forces an abnormal
closure of the program as Windows closes. And we all know that abnormal
shutdowns tend to go against the grain of the normal operation of many
programs.
So my question is this: HOW is it possible that a company with the brains
and power of Microsoft can continue to market a program over a large number
of years (I had the same problem with Outlook 2003) without even being able
to design into the program an ability to shut down correctly?
As you can see this really gets my goat. I use Outlook because it's there
and I dont' like to change platforms after years of keeping my data stored in
one program. But I find this kind of pre-school programming incompetency to
be both laughable and extroardinarily annoying?
Can anyone from Microsoft respond to this matter?
Elliot Berlin
navigation pane, usually resulting in the loss of the many folder shortcuts
I've arranged for my convenience and productivity. I think I know what part
of the problem is and I wonder what and when Microsoft will do something
about it.
When I shut down Outlook 2007 from either the file/exit menu or by clicking
the red "X" in Vista, the program appears to shut down. But it usually
remains active indefinitely as indicated by iits failure to disappear from
the Windows Task Manager.
What this suggests is that when Windows is shut down it forces an abnormal
closure of the program as Windows closes. And we all know that abnormal
shutdowns tend to go against the grain of the normal operation of many
programs.
So my question is this: HOW is it possible that a company with the brains
and power of Microsoft can continue to market a program over a large number
of years (I had the same problem with Outlook 2003) without even being able
to design into the program an ability to shut down correctly?
As you can see this really gets my goat. I use Outlook because it's there
and I dont' like to change platforms after years of keeping my data stored in
one program. But I find this kind of pre-school programming incompetency to
be both laughable and extroardinarily annoying?
Can anyone from Microsoft respond to this matter?
Elliot Berlin