Nintendo Revolution will use MoSys 1T-SRAM. my thoughts

N

nintendog

http://gc.advancedmn.com/article.php?artid=4846

(read the article there, it is *not* pasted below)

Revolution is apparently going to be released in mid 2006. it will be using
MoSys 1T-SRAM for memory, like the Gamecube.

it seems that Elpida lost out on the Revolution RAM deal.

Elpida is a major provider of RAM. they're one of the RAM providers of
Rambus XDR memory for the upcoming PlayStation3.

MoSys was first selected by Nintendo in the late 1990s to make the RAM for
Dolphin (Gamecube) because of their special low-latency (fast) 1T-SRAM.

It seems Nintendo liked it enough to keep MoSys in on the successor system.

now lets hope that there is *enough* RAM in -Revolution- to make developers
happy.

It was revealed at Nintendo's Spaceworld 2000 show in Japan that the amount
of RAM in Gamecube was cut dramatically, compared to how much it was
originally supposed to have when the system was called Project Dolphin.


http://rage3d.com/board/showthread.php?p=1333687339#post1333687339

"okay, you probably don't know or remember this, but, back in 1999 and upto
August 2000, the Nintendo Dolphin, which ARTX was the central hardware
developer of, was supposed to get 8 MB to 16 MB of embedded 1T-SRAM on that
Flipper GPU -- but by Spaceworld in Aug 2000, that amount was cut to 3.12
MB.

(the main system memory was changed from 32~64 MB of NEC DRAM to 24 MB of
MoSys 1T-SRAM)


Now we learn that MoSys is again back with Nintendo for the Gamecube's
successor, the Revolution. there is almost no doubt that ATI West Coast, the
Silicon Valley design center in Santa Clara, CA is working with MoSys and
NEC to embedded some next generation 1T-SRAM onto Revolution's GPU,
codenamed 'Hollywood'.

how much baby, that is the question! "
 
F

First of One

Stop cross-posting to the PC groups. Not everyone gives a rat's ass about
your thoughts.
 
A

Alan Balmer

Nor those of top-posters.

In this case, top posting was appropriate, since it was a comment
about the message that was not a response to anything in the message.
However, quoting the whole damned thing was not appropriate.

comp.arch.embedded removed from distribution.
 
K

keith

In this case, top posting was appropriate,

Really? ...without trimming? Wow! You are a case.
since it was a comment
about the message that was not a response to anything in the message.
However, quoting the whole damned thing was not appropriate.

Exactly. Top-posters are normally dim-wits.
comp.arch.embedded removed from distribution.

Ah, another hit-n-run.
 
B

Bob Myers

Al Borowski said:
No, it means his newsreader supports threads.

Or that it doesn't automatically jump to the bottom when some
moron neglects to trim the quoted material appropriately.

Top-posting is bad - ALMOST as bad as a bottom-poster
who doesn't trim, and makes you wade through 300 lines of
other @#$$&@^%! you've already read just to get to his
"me, too!" comment.

Bob M.
 
F

Frank Bemelman

Bob Myers said:
Or that it doesn't automatically jump to the bottom when some
moron neglects to trim the quoted material appropriately.

Top-posting is bad - ALMOST as bad as a bottom-poster
who doesn't trim, and makes you wade through 300 lines of
other @#$$&@^%! you've already read just to get to his
"me, too!" comment.

Replace "ALMOST as bad as" with "Even worse than" and I
would have made that "me, too!" comment ;)
 
Y

Yousuf Khan

chrisv said:
Andrew M wrote:




Only idiots top post.

Bottom posting does require that people try to at least trim the quote
levels down a little bit. Keep only the immediate two context levels,
not the context from the beginning of the thread.

Yousuf Khan
 
A

Alan Balmer

Bottom posting does require that people try to at least trim the quote
levels down a little bit. Keep only the immediate two context levels,
not the context from the beginning of the thread.
Those who trim and properly intersperse their responses with the item
responded to can be trusted to make up their own mind as to what
context to include.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top