S
Steve H
If those links are expecting a certain file path to be followed then
yes.
You really are a compete waste of DNA, aren't you?
When people write linked html documents that are likely to be moved
around ( i.e. they exist on drives rather than on the 'web' ) all
paths are set relative to the root document. In effect, there is no
written path - it's assumed to be " \".
For example, from the raw html from one document within the folder:
< a href="index.html">Home
Can you spot the path? No - because there isn't one as such...all
that's needed is for the associated documents to be within the same
folder. This makes the folder 'portable'.
What an utterly idiotic idea. The OS would have to quite literally rewrite
each and every HTML file it came into contact with
I guess you don't understand the concept of 'working directories' or
'open in' either.
No, It didn't work because you didn't know what the hell you were
doing.
How would you know? You've tripped up at every point along the way so
far, and in your next display of staggering ignorance you're about to
take another tumble.
*YOU MOVED* the files from the cdrom drive to another drive via your
so-called "shortcut".
So, 'move' and 'copy' aren't terms you're able to differentiate
between either. Ever tried moving a file off a CDRom?
Here's a tip, don't bother going for that sysadmin job...and when
someone says 'large fries' it's the big bucket, OK?
You *DISRUPTED THE PATH THE LINKS ASSUMED WAS THERE*,you moronic ass.
I think I've been patient enough in explaining to you a concept that
doesn't seem to trouble even the most inexperienced of computer users.
I guess I could resort to drawing ascii pictures - but instead I think
most people wouldn't think it too inappropriate to tell you to piss
off and come back when you've wised up. Should be a very long time
indeed.