More on Registry Cleaners

[Twayne]

I'm not worried. You're the one posting unsolicited commercial
advertisements. That's spam, plain and simple.

What's interesting here is the implicit admission that you are wrong and
that you know it. The very likely possibility that you know you are
wrong is supported by your refusal quite some time ago and even recently
to to provide even empirical experiences or research other than a couple
of MS's cleaner's articles you used for parts of your boilerplate posts
about no registry cleaner having any value. Once can only conclude from
your actions that you know nothing of the situation now or even of such
apps in the past. Or I suppose that you may simply have a childish
mentality.

 

[Xandros]

What's interesting here is the implicit admission that you are wrong and
that you know it. The very likely possibility that you know you are wrong
is supported by your refusal quite some time ago and even recently to to
provide even empirical experiences or research other than a couple of MS's
cleaner's articles you used for parts of your boilerplate posts about no
registry cleaner having any value. Once can only conclude from your
actions that you know nothing of the situation now or even of such apps in
the past. Or I suppose that you may simply have a childish mentality.

Twayne I've used a variety of registry cleaners over the years and there
have only been a few rare exceptions when I encountered any serious negative
effects to my system by using them. I run 5 systems on my home network, I
run 7 systems at work. I run CCleaner daily on a couple of them and no
registry cleaners on several of them. By and large I see the majority of
registry cleaners as performing a similar function whether they are freeware
or commercial. So I use freeware instead of paying $30 for a program that
likely doesn't do any better of a job than the freeware.