Looking for a CF v2.0 Code Profiler ...

[Guest]

Does anyone know of a good code profiler that works on mobile applications?
Most the products that I've been able to search for only work on the
desktops/servers .... they work on .NET v1.1, v2.0, and v3.0, but they don't
work on Windows CE v5 / Compact Framework clients.

Would love to be able to track performance and memory leaks on the mobile
apps as well as the "big iron."

Thanks for any insight / suggestions.

 

[Guest]

Remote Performance Monitor and the tools with CF 3.5 are a big leap forward
from what has been available, and might give what you need. Get the Orcas
CTP and they're in there.


--

Chris Tacke, Embedded MVP
OpenNETCF Consulting
Managed Code in an Embedded World
www.OpenNETCF.com

 

[Guest]

Yes, we seen those. Our problem is we're a ways away from running Orcas.
We'll be on VS 2005 Pro for a bit longer. As such, I'm trying to find
something that would work in a straight .NET 2.0/3.0/CF 2.0 environment.

Any thoughts??

 

[Guest]

The profiler is still valid for older apps. We've used it to profile stuff
we developed in '05 and built against 2.0.

I doubt you'll find much that will just work with the existing tool chains -
there's nothing out there that I'm aware of for older stuff, and since MS is
creating tools, the incentive for anyone to "compete" with free is really
low.


--

Chris Tacke, Embedded MVP
OpenNETCF Consulting
Managed Code in an Embedded World
www.OpenNETCF.com

 

[Guest]

We run VS 2005 Professional, but I've noticed the Team edition has some
profiling ability
(http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/teamsystem/aa718845.aspx). I can't seem to
find if it supports mobile dev specifically, but the way they describe it ...
it seems like it might. Do you know or have any experience with the Team
version?

 

[Guest]

Yes, I use TS - the tools are not compatible with device code.


--

Chris Tacke, Embedded MVP
OpenNETCF Consulting
Managed Code in an Embedded World
www.OpenNETCF.com

 

[Guest]

Hum .... that figures .... no such luck. Okay .... guess I will take another
look @ 3.5.

Thanks Chris,

Markus