G
Guest
I've read many many many posts on registry cleaners, and by in large have
concluded they are not normally needed. However, that being said, why has
Microsoft come out with one on their safety live clean up site?
I will say for the record that I've used registry healer on my business
computer after 2 years of hard use. Hard use here being defined as update
pushes from the IT group who likes to "secure and customize" Window patches.
Yea, scares me too. I noticed an improvement when I booted. No, I didn't
use a stop watch, too much like work. I can say before the cleanup it was
taking around 2 minutes, and now it boots in under a minute.
That being said, that was after two years of hard use. So I've always
thought that my home computer probably did not have those issues. Still, I'm
surprised to see Microsoft with their own registry cleaner. So is it a good
idea afterall to run these things?
Gary
concluded they are not normally needed. However, that being said, why has
Microsoft come out with one on their safety live clean up site?
I will say for the record that I've used registry healer on my business
computer after 2 years of hard use. Hard use here being defined as update
pushes from the IT group who likes to "secure and customize" Window patches.
Yea, scares me too. I noticed an improvement when I booted. No, I didn't
use a stop watch, too much like work. I can say before the cleanup it was
taking around 2 minutes, and now it boots in under a minute.
That being said, that was after two years of hard use. So I've always
thought that my home computer probably did not have those issues. Still, I'm
surprised to see Microsoft with their own registry cleaner. So is it a good
idea afterall to run these things?
Gary