Linux: It doesn't get any faster

A

Alias

http://blogs.computerworld.com/linux_it_doesnt_get_any_faster

For those who are running Windows and are afraid of clicking on an URL
(with good reason, being as Windows is SO vulnerable to malware), I have
copied the entire article:

By Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols
Created Jun 23 2009 - 11:43am

"The Windows' fan club likes to point out that Windows is far more
popular than Linux. The reason for that has nothing to do with quality
and everything to do with monopoly. Nothing shows that better than the
semi-annual TOP500 list of the world's most powerful supercomputers [1].
In the latest ranking, where performance is everything and nothing else
matters, Windows is stalled out at the starting line, and Linux is
lapping the field.

Specifically, Linux has increased its already substantial supercomputer
market share [2] to 88.6%. Linux is followed by hybrid Unix/Linux
systems with 5.8%; Unix, mostly IBM's AIX, with 4.4%; and running close
to last, Windows HPC (high-performance computing) with 1%. Only BSD,
with a single representative on the list, trails Windows.

In the lead at the number 1 spot with 1.105 petaflop/s (quadrillions of
floating point operations per second) is the Los Alamos National
Laboratory Roadrunner system by IBM. Roadrunner was the first system, to
break the petaflop/s Linpack barrier [3] in June 2008.

How fast is that? According to the Department of Energy [4], which paid
for the Roadrunner, "One petaflop is 1,000 trillion operations per
second. To put this into perspective, if each of the 6 billion people on
earth had a hand calculator and worked together on a calculation 24
hours per day, 365 days a year, it would take 46 years to do what
Roadrunner would do in one day."

And, of course, the Roadrunner is fueled by Linux. In fact, all the top
ten run Linux.

The hardware the supercomputers run on is quickly shifting over to
multi-core processors. In this latest ranking, only four supercomputers
still use single-core CPUs. Quad-core processor-based systems are found
in 383 systems, while 102 systems are using dual-core processors. In
addition, four supercomputers are now using IBM's Sony PlayStation 3
processor with 9 cores. Yes, that's right, top of the line
supercomputers use the same top of the line processors found in
PlayStations. Neat isn't it?

Most of the supercomputer processors though come from Intel. To be
exact, 399 systems, 79.8% are Intel. IBM Power processors come in second
with 55 systems, 11% with AMD Opteron family with 43 systems in the
third spot.

Regardless of the processor, one thing isn't just staying the same, it's
actually growing, and that's Linux in supercomputers. When being the
fastest of the fast is all that matters, Linux isn't just winning, it's
extending its lead."

[1] http://www.top500.org/lists/2009/06/press-release
[2] http://blogs.computerworld.com/where_windows_is_2_to_linux
[3]
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9095279
[4] http://www.energy.gov/news/6321.htm

Alias
 
B

Bill Yanaire

Alias said:
http://blogs.computerworld.com/linux_it_doesnt_get_any_faster

For those who are running Windows and are afraid of clicking on an URL
(with good reason, being as Windows is SO vulnerable to malware), I have
copied the entire article:

By Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols
Created Jun 23 2009 - 11:43am

"The Windows' fan club likes to point out that Windows is far more popular
than Linux. The reason for that has nothing to do with quality and
everything to do with monopoly. Nothing shows that better than the
semi-annual TOP500 list of the world's most powerful supercomputers [1].
In the latest ranking, where performance is everything and nothing else
matters, Windows is stalled out at the starting line, and Linux is lapping
the field.

Specifically, Linux has increased its already substantial supercomputer
market share [2] to 88.6%. Linux is followed by hybrid Unix/Linux systems
with 5.8%; Unix, mostly IBM's AIX, with 4.4%; and running close to last,
Windows HPC (high-performance computing) with 1%. Only BSD, with a single
representative on the list, trails Windows.

In the lead at the number 1 spot with 1.105 petaflop/s (quadrillions of
floating point operations per second) is the Los Alamos National
Laboratory Roadrunner system by IBM. Roadrunner was the first system, to
break the petaflop/s Linpack barrier [3] in June 2008.

How fast is that? According to the Department of Energy [4], which paid
for the Roadrunner, "One petaflop is 1,000 trillion operations per second.
To put this into perspective, if each of the 6 billion people on earth had
a hand calculator and worked together on a calculation 24 hours per day,
365 days a year, it would take 46 years to do what Roadrunner would do in
one day."

And, of course, the Roadrunner is fueled by Linux. In fact, all the top
ten run Linux.

The hardware the supercomputers run on is quickly shifting over to
multi-core processors. In this latest ranking, only four supercomputers
still use single-core CPUs. Quad-core processor-based systems are found in
383 systems, while 102 systems are using dual-core processors. In
addition, four supercomputers are now using IBM's Sony PlayStation 3
processor with 9 cores. Yes, that's right, top of the line supercomputers
use the same top of the line processors found in PlayStations. Neat isn't
it?

Most of the supercomputer processors though come from Intel. To be exact,
399 systems, 79.8% are Intel. IBM Power processors come in second with 55
systems, 11% with AMD Opteron family with 43 systems in the third spot.

Regardless of the processor, one thing isn't just staying the same, it's
actually growing, and that's Linux in supercomputers. When being the
fastest of the fast is all that matters, Linux isn't just winning, it's
extending its lead."


So you are talking supercomputers. No problem with that. I even agree.
How about this? Install Ubuntu on a desktop computer than try to run any of
the popular software programs out there. It doesn't matter if the computer
runs with 75 quad core processors and processes with 7661.105 petaflop/s,
the computer just won't run your software. Therefore it doesn't matter.

If you want to run your popular software programs that you already own, you
need an operating system that will run them. Windows is the answer.

Now if you want to play with an operating system that was written by geeks
for geeks, then by all means, download that INFERIOR Ubuntu and teraflop,
pitaflop all day long doing NOTHING.
 
A

Alias

Bill said:
Alias said:
http://blogs.computerworld.com/linux_it_doesnt_get_any_faster

For those who are running Windows and are afraid of clicking on an URL
(with good reason, being as Windows is SO vulnerable to malware), I have
copied the entire article:

By Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols
Created Jun 23 2009 - 11:43am

"The Windows' fan club likes to point out that Windows is far more popular
than Linux. The reason for that has nothing to do with quality and
everything to do with monopoly. Nothing shows that better than the
semi-annual TOP500 list of the world's most powerful supercomputers [1].
In the latest ranking, where performance is everything and nothing else
matters, Windows is stalled out at the starting line, and Linux is lapping
the field.

Specifically, Linux has increased its already substantial supercomputer
market share [2] to 88.6%. Linux is followed by hybrid Unix/Linux systems
with 5.8%; Unix, mostly IBM's AIX, with 4.4%; and running close to last,
Windows HPC (high-performance computing) with 1%. Only BSD, with a single
representative on the list, trails Windows.

In the lead at the number 1 spot with 1.105 petaflop/s (quadrillions of
floating point operations per second) is the Los Alamos National
Laboratory Roadrunner system by IBM. Roadrunner was the first system, to
break the petaflop/s Linpack barrier [3] in June 2008.

How fast is that? According to the Department of Energy [4], which paid
for the Roadrunner, "One petaflop is 1,000 trillion operations per second.
To put this into perspective, if each of the 6 billion people on earth had
a hand calculator and worked together on a calculation 24 hours per day,
365 days a year, it would take 46 years to do what Roadrunner would do in
one day."

And, of course, the Roadrunner is fueled by Linux. In fact, all the top
ten run Linux.

The hardware the supercomputers run on is quickly shifting over to
multi-core processors. In this latest ranking, only four supercomputers
still use single-core CPUs. Quad-core processor-based systems are found in
383 systems, while 102 systems are using dual-core processors. In
addition, four supercomputers are now using IBM's Sony PlayStation 3
processor with 9 cores. Yes, that's right, top of the line supercomputers
use the same top of the line processors found in PlayStations. Neat isn't
it?

Most of the supercomputer processors though come from Intel. To be exact,
399 systems, 79.8% are Intel. IBM Power processors come in second with 55
systems, 11% with AMD Opteron family with 43 systems in the third spot.

Regardless of the processor, one thing isn't just staying the same, it's
actually growing, and that's Linux in supercomputers. When being the
fastest of the fast is all that matters, Linux isn't just winning, it's
extending its lead."


So you are talking supercomputers. No problem with that. I even agree.

Windows was left in dust.
How about this? Install Ubuntu on a desktop computer than try to run any of
the popular software programs out there.

The most popular programs out there run just fine in Ubuntu.
It doesn't matter if the computer
runs with 75 quad core processors and processes with 7661.105 petaflop/s,
the computer just won't run your software. Therefore it doesn't matter.

Fortunately, your ill informed opinion doesn't matter.
If you want to run your popular software programs that you already own, you
need an operating system that will run them. Windows is the answer.

No, Ubuntu runs them just fine.
 
A

Alias

Frank said:
Alias, the LIAR wrote:

<---deleted your linux spam-->

So you still say you're not spamming this Vista ng with linux spam?

Nope, offering alternatives to the piggy Vista is on topic. Your
insults, lies, profanity and weird animal sex fantasies are OFF topic.

Alias
 
B

Bill Yanaire

Alias said:
Nope, offering alternatives to the piggy Vista is on topic. Your insults,
lies, profanity and weird animal sex fantasies are OFF topic.

Alias

How on earth is spewing your filth about Ubuntu on topic in the
VISTA.GENERAL group? People who come here want to get their issues fixed.
They don't want or need that INFERIOR OS you call Ubuntu that NOBODY wants.

Remember: Ubuntu was written by geeks for geeks. Ubuntu is FREE and is on
less than one percent of the desktops out there. That should tell you all
you need to know about that crappy product that NOBODY wants.
 
A

Alias

Bill said:
How on earth is spewing your filth about Ubuntu on topic in the
VISTA.GENERAL group? People who come here want to get their issues fixed.
They don't want or need that INFERIOR OS you call Ubuntu that NOBODY wants.

Remember: Ubuntu was written by geeks for geeks. Ubuntu is FREE and is on
less than one percent of the desktops out there. That should tell you all
you need to know about that crappy product that NOBODY wants.

Want a cracker?

Alias
 
A

Alias

Frank said:
Hahaha...yeah...IT'S SPAM!!! I know it, you know it and everyone in here
knows it.

Sorry, chum, but you're wrong yet again.
You're sick and that is a fact.

Your ill informed opinion and rich coming from a disgusting troll such
as yourself.
You've proven to everyone in here over and over again that you are in
fact a liar, a spammer and a linux troll.

And the proof, other than your lame imagination is?
Your constant denials only underscores the fact that you are one really
sick POS loser.

No, denying a lie only proves that the lie is a lie.

Alias
 
A

Alias

Vlad-the-Impaler said:
Too bad you don't have a supercomputer.

Don't need one.
You have an old AMD with ubunturd.....lol.

I have three computers, all running like silk. One of them is modern
enough to run Vista, not that I would put that POS on a computer again.
It's why you are stuck playing with T-Bird all day.

I do a lot more than that.
It's the only OpenSores software you can run.

And your proof of this is?
Vista is faster on PC's...PERIOD.

How long have you had this erroneous fantasy?

Alias
 
B

Bill Yanaire

Alias said:
Got plenty, thanks, and I doubt you have one to give.

Alias

You are correct on that one. I don't have a single Euro but I have lots of
DOLLARS! I can even afford a car!

Just FYI.
 
A

Alias

Bill said:
You are correct on that one. I don't have a single Euro but I have lots of
DOLLARS! I can even afford a car!

So can I. Your point or do you even have one besides playing the fool?

Alias
 
B

Bill Yanaire

Alias said:
So can I. Your point or do you even have one besides playing the fool?

Alias

You have it backwards. You are the fool. I'll prove it to you. This is
the Vista.General forum. People come here for solutions to their problems
with Vista. That means they own Vista. Now in comes Alias trying to get
those same people to trash their OS, throw away all their paid for software,
download an INFERIOR OS called Ubuntu, use Open Sores software that is about
10 years back in technology. Now you tell me? Who is the fool here?

P.S. In case you refuse to answer the question: The CORRECT answer is
Alias is the fool.
 
A

Alias

Frank said:
Oops!
Well alias, you can't keep your lying stupid mouth shut can you? You
only dig deeper into that abyss of lies you call your life.
Print this out and have a responsibility adult explain it to you.
#1 lie from alias is:
pushing linux as an alternative to Vista in this Vista ng is "on
topic"...Hahahahaha...YOU SICK ****!!!
#2 lie from alias is:
..."I do not spam this ng with ubuntu spam"
#3 lie from alias is::
..."I am not trolling this Vista ng with linux/ubuntu bullshit"...Hahaha!
#4 lie from alias is:
..."I make $14,000 per week"...Hahahaha...you lying sick ****!
#5 lie from alias is:
..."I was in the 101st U.S. Army Airborne Division"...Hahaha!
#6 lie from alias is:...
I am not a liar"!...Hahaha!

Want some more you LYING SICK ****!!!

First you have to have some to have more. All the above are NOT lies and
you know it but that won't stop you from posting it again, again and
again like a mindless robot.

Alias
 
A

Alias

Bill said:
You have it backwards. You are the fool. I'll prove it to you. This is
the Vista.General forum. People come here for solutions to their problems
with Vista.

And that includes alternatives to Vista. Live with it and try to get the
**** over it cause it ain't going away.

Snip lying mindless drivel.

Alias
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top