T
Tom
Leythos said:To disagree is one thing, to actively tell people to subvert or to
actively go against the agreement is another thing entirely.
Where did I tell others to do that? This is just hyperbole on your part, to
mask what you won't provide or prove, other than you unreal interpreations
that are not mentioned in the ACTUAL EULA during the install.
This quote from the site (listed above) clearly states that changing the
motherboard invalidates the license (except for a repair):
Where does this say that in the EULA, you miss the effin' point that I
agreed to the EULA, not something that is far and away. If this was really
the point, then why not just state that in the EULA. This is one of ways MS
gets people suckered into buying, changing things into their (monetary)
favor, by doing the things you say are binding, when that isn't the
agreement that was clicked on during the install.
You can't disagree with what they say or how it applies to the OEM
products, you can disagree with following it, but the simple fact is that
it's quite clear - this is the only position I have on this subject. I've
not said I approve or disapprove with their rule/license, only that it's
quite clear on the licensing part for OEM installations.
You said specifically from the get-go, that the MOBO dies, the OEM license
dies with it, and that is what the EULA means according to another source
not directly listed in the EULA, or referenced as fact on the EULA itself.
this means that the contract I agreed to is the one enforce, not a web site,
where it could state anything it wants, as to make them more money, or
whatever. The EULA needs to state what you say the website states. One
cannot install an OEM license, then to click the "I agree to blah blah blah
terms" radio button as an agreement, only to say that a website one visits
using the browser from the agreed to, installed OS is the real deal. Those
are your words, not those listed in the EULA, and you have yet to show where
it says that in the EULA.