G
Guest
First off, let me say that Defender seems to be working properly on my PC, as
far as I know. I do not want to uninstall it - yet - but if I ever do, I will
have to worry about what it might have changed on my PC that I won't be able
to undo without it. After reading all the problems being experienced by so
many, I am left with anxiety about how long it will take me to discover
something is terribly wrong here. I won't run down a laundry list of
problems. Any one with eyes can see for themselves. I have also detected a
hint from the insiders who post that Defender has been made idiot proof so
ordinary users can't screw it up. IMHO, this if proof of the idiocy of
Defender. Too much has been hidden from sight or taken away from what was
available in MSAS beta 1. MSAS worked. It is debatable where Defender works
or not. Furthermore, it seems to take control away from the PC user or at
least hides what it is doing. I don't think the ordinary user - idiot or not-
will appreciate all the workarounds required to make Defender behave. Yes -
behave - because it seems to out of control, at least in some instances. The
ordinary user certainly will not want to make manual registry changes because
of Defender. With all the possible installation problems, I would never
recommend that someone install Defender on an infected computer that is
already in crisis. I personally am hanging on, with the hope that a new build
will resolve some of these issues. But how long will that take? When I was
using MSAS, I never dreamed that beta 2 would be so much trouble. And please,
don't remind me that it IS still beta. It may be beta, but it is so
predominantly advertised on every Microsoft security at home document that
oridinary users will intall expecting it to work like GM. That's my opinon.
What's yours?
far as I know. I do not want to uninstall it - yet - but if I ever do, I will
have to worry about what it might have changed on my PC that I won't be able
to undo without it. After reading all the problems being experienced by so
many, I am left with anxiety about how long it will take me to discover
something is terribly wrong here. I won't run down a laundry list of
problems. Any one with eyes can see for themselves. I have also detected a
hint from the insiders who post that Defender has been made idiot proof so
ordinary users can't screw it up. IMHO, this if proof of the idiocy of
Defender. Too much has been hidden from sight or taken away from what was
available in MSAS beta 1. MSAS worked. It is debatable where Defender works
or not. Furthermore, it seems to take control away from the PC user or at
least hides what it is doing. I don't think the ordinary user - idiot or not-
will appreciate all the workarounds required to make Defender behave. Yes -
behave - because it seems to out of control, at least in some instances. The
ordinary user certainly will not want to make manual registry changes because
of Defender. With all the possible installation problems, I would never
recommend that someone install Defender on an infected computer that is
already in crisis. I personally am hanging on, with the hope that a new build
will resolve some of these issues. But how long will that take? When I was
using MSAS, I never dreamed that beta 2 would be so much trouble. And please,
don't remind me that it IS still beta. It may be beta, but it is so
predominantly advertised on every Microsoft security at home document that
oridinary users will intall expecting it to work like GM. That's my opinon.
What's yours?