P
p.mc
**Hi, I asked this question below on the 25/07/07 in this group.**
------------------------------------
Hi All
Is it possible to have;
2 X...80gb sataII HDD's [8mb cache] in raid 0 (O/S)
1 X...400gb sataII HDD [16mb cache] (Data)
If so, what's the best config...Master/Primary...etc. and would there be a
problem with the difference in Cache sizes?
------------------------------------
**And I got this answer below**
------------------------------------
SATA Drives no longer use the Master/Slave Scenario. So if you have a
Raid Controller and an extra sata connector on
your Motherboard then sure you shouldnt have any problems. Cache sizes
should have very little effect if any.
------------------------------------
** I was then told on another forum that the O/S should not be in raid
config, but on it's own seperate drive, as I was hoping that the O/S could
be mirrored, to necessitate the need for re-installing WinXp if one of the
80gb HDD's failed??
Maybe the replier didn't notice (O/S) at the end!!**
Can anyone resolve this for me?
------------------------------------
Hi All
Is it possible to have;
2 X...80gb sataII HDD's [8mb cache] in raid 0 (O/S)
1 X...400gb sataII HDD [16mb cache] (Data)
If so, what's the best config...Master/Primary...etc. and would there be a
problem with the difference in Cache sizes?
------------------------------------
**And I got this answer below**
------------------------------------
SATA Drives no longer use the Master/Slave Scenario. So if you have a
Raid Controller and an extra sata connector on
your Motherboard then sure you shouldnt have any problems. Cache sizes
should have very little effect if any.
------------------------------------
** I was then told on another forum that the O/S should not be in raid
config, but on it's own seperate drive, as I was hoping that the O/S could
be mirrored, to necessitate the need for re-installing WinXp if one of the
80gb HDD's failed??
Maybe the replier didn't notice (O/S) at the end!!**
Can anyone resolve this for me?