Then I hope you aren't building your own systems. Just kidding!!!
Actually, I've been building systems for many years, using all types of
processors including Intel and Cyrix (now "Via", I guess). I've also been
following the AMD/Intel skirmish (can we really call it a war?) for quite
some time. The only thing consistent is that AMD processors are just as
good as Intel, and usually for a lower price. If you want stability, you
can build AMD. If you want raw power, you can build AMD. If you want to
spend more money, you can build Intel. If anybody ever asked me (AMD or
Intel?), I'd tell them to build AMD and use the money they save to double
their RAM or buy a better video card. The end result will be a better
system for the same amount of money.
What pisses me off about the AMD/Intel thing is that Intel is in the process
of pushing a new form factor of computer system they call "BTX". I've done
extensive research on it. What it amounts to is . . . if Chevy wanted to
make a "BTX", they would start with an "ATX", rotate the tires side to side
and move the cupholders a few inches. There is literally nothing in the BTX
form factor that couldn't easily be implemented in the current ATX form
factor. What I want to know is . . . why is Intel designing the next form
factor? I don't really have anything against Intel personally. If someone
asked me to build an Intel system for them, I would . . . and gladly. But
why is Intel designing the new form factor with no input from AMD, or
anybody else? If a new form factor is needed (it is NOT), shouldn't the new
form factor be designed by a third party, maybe a group of independent
hardware manufacturers? That would make a lot more sense than having it
dictated by Intel. The BTX, as Intel has drafted it, is ummmm . . .
bullshit, to put it bluntly. I don't think it will hurt AMD at all, but it
is a change that is not needed. I think this clearly demonstrates that
Intel has way too much power. It's like the new manager who right away
fires all the most competent workers, just to demonstrate that he/she has
real power. Is it good for consumers or the PC industry? No. In fact, I
don't see as it does Intel much good either, other than as a display of
power. In other words, I think Intel is doing it just because Intel can.
And we all lose. IMHO If ever there was a good reason to buy AMD right
now, THAT is IT. IMHO -Dave