Firewall

Z

Zygy

I am temporarily without my ZoneAlarm Firewall, but I restarted the Windows
Firewall. Since I always had the other one on, which stopped many
intrusions, I would appreciate your views on how secure is the Window one,
before I connect the PC to the Internet.
 
G

Guest

Zygy said:
I am temporarily without my ZoneAlarm Firewall, but I restarted the Windows
Firewall. Since I always had the other one on, which stopped many
intrusions, I would appreciate your views on how secure is the Window one,
before I connect the PC to the Internet.

It is secure enough to take you there and get you back, if you will not go
deep in the Jungle??.
I will take it you have Anti-Virus and Anti-Malwares and all up2date, try to
raise your Browser security with Win Firewall with common sense and you are
safe.
HTH.
nass
 
B

Bruce Chambers

Zygy said:
I am temporarily without my ZoneAlarm Firewall, but I restarted the Windows
Firewall. Since I always had the other one on, which stopped many
intrusions, I would appreciate your views on how secure is the Window one,
before I connect the PC to the Internet.


The Windows Firewall included with SP2, while vastly superior to
the original ICF in terms of visibility, usability and configurability,
is still rather lacking, as a solid security component. It still can't
supplant 3rd-party solutions, nor is it intended to do so; rather, it's
intended to complement them. And, like the original ICF, it will not
monitor out-going traffic.

WinXP's built-in firewall is usually adequate at stopping incoming
attacks, and hiding your ports from probes. What WinXP SP2's firewall
does not do, is protect you from any Trojans or spyware that you (or
someone else using your computer) might download and install
inadvertently. It doesn't monitor out-going traffic at all, other than
to check for IP-spoofing, much less block (or at even ask you about) the
bad or the questionable out-going signals. It assumes that any
application you have on your hard drive is there because you want it
there, and therefore has your "permission" to access the Internet.
Further, because the Windows Firewall is a "stateful" firewall, it will
also assume that any incoming traffic that's a direct response to a
Trojan's or spyware's out-going signal is also authorized.

ZoneAlarm, Kerio, or Sygate are all much better than WinXP's
built-in firewall, and are much more easily configured, and there are
free versions of each readily available. Even the commercially
available Symantec's Norton Personal Firewall is superior by far,
although it does take a heavier toll of system performance then do
ZoneAlarm or Sygate.

Having said that, it's important to remember that firewalls and
anti-virus applications, which should always be used and should always
be running, while important components of "safe hex," cannot, and should
not be expected to, protect the computer user from him/herself.
Ultimately, it is incumbent upon each and every computer user to learn
how to secure his/her own computer.


--

Bruce Chambers

Help us help you:



They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. -Benjamin Franklin

Many people would rather die than think; in fact, most do. -Bertrand Russell
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top