Editing a context menu

O

omega

ms said:
Every so often, I run a file, get the screen: "missing MSCOREE" (IIRC)
What does that signify, other than a missing file?

Signifies the app is dependent on the MSFT .NET framework ...
 
M

ms

someone said:
Hi Mike. Surely there must be a local (to you) computer users club\group.
The guys are generally very helpful and friendly.
I`m sure someone would d\load and burn for you.
In some ways, Oregon is the land time forgot. If I lived in Portland, that would be
different.

No computer club locally, the people I know, like me, are on DUN. One fellow's sig is
out in the sticks, I know what he means.

Mike Sa
 
J

jmatt

ms said:
Every so often, I run a file, get the screen: "missing MSCOREE" (IIRC)

Other possibles Mike.

missing MSCOREE
http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&q=missing+MSCOREE&btnG=Google+Search&meta=

How to uninstall the MSI installer
http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&q=How+to+uninstall+the+MSI+installer&btnG=Search&meta=
Howto uninstall the MSI installer
http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&q=Howto+uninstall+the+MSI+installer&btnG=Search&meta=
Was your experience with W2K that it is:
a. more stable than W98SE
b. more resistant to software caused crashes than W98SE, easier to recover?
W2k is a predecessor to XP, which is super stable & W2k is lot more
stable than 98.

w2k system repair
http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&q=w2k+system+repair&btnG=Search&meta=
repair w2k
http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&q=repair+w2k&meta=
 
J

jmatt

David wrote:
Whereabouts in Australia? I'm in Adelaide.
G'day David, I'm 20 km's east of Perth, W.A.
 
A

Al Klein

Some programs on install need reboot, most do not. What is the implication when an
install demands a reboot to be effective?

Mike, that sometimes means that the program installed a newer version
of a dll or ocx, and that Windows has to reboot to recognize the
change - or that a file that has to be replaced is currently open so,
again, Windows has to reboot for the old file to be replaced.
Was your experience with W2K that it is:
a. more stable than W98SE

98SE wasn't particularly unstable, but 2k is particularly stable, so
maybe there's a little difference. (I know a 2k server that's run for
years between reboots.)
b. more resistant to software caused crashes than W98SE, easier to recover?

Depends on the cause of the crash. A really well-written (or
poorly-written, depending on your viewpoint) program can crash any OS.
 
D

David

David wrote:
Whereabouts in Australia? I'm in Adelaide.
G'day David, I'm 20 km's east of Perth, W.A.

Contact me offlist. Reply to this message by mail or decode the
address below.

--
Regards
David Simpson
"Men have two emotions: Hungry and Horny. If you see him
without an erection, make him a sandwich."
- Someone on soc.sexuality.general
justdas at iinet dot net dot au
 
M

ms

Al said:
Mike, that sometimes means that the program installed a newer version
of a dll or ocx, and that Windows has to reboot to recognize the
change - or that a file that has to be replaced is currently open so,
again, Windows has to reboot for the old file to be replaced.




98SE wasn't particularly unstable, but 2k is particularly stable, so
maybe there's a little difference. (I know a 2k server that's run for
years between reboots.)




Depends on the cause of the crash. A really well-written (or
poorly-written, depending on your viewpoint) program can crash any OS.

Thanks, Al. Your last sentence is IMO an axiom. I have heard diametrically opposed
opinions about 2K vs. W98SE. In about 3 months I will have an opinion too. BTW, since
my recent fresh install, W98SE runs just fine online with NO patches (don't use IE),
use a firewall, so far. I never believed in those old "critical" MS patches even
though I loaded them.

Mike Sa
 
M

ms


Thanks for good data, John. Will try it.
W2K comments in reply to Al.

Mike Sa
 
C

Chris

Al Klein said:
98SE wasn't particularly unstable, but 2k is particularly stable, so
maybe there's a little difference. (I know a 2k server that's run for
years between reboots.)

Microsoft says that 2k is forty times as reliable as 98SE.
 
A

Al Klein

Microsoft says that 2k is forty times as reliable as 98SE.

Microsoft also said that no one would EVER need more than 640k of RAM.

Take a MS pronouncement for whatever you think it's worth. Personally
I value the advice my dead cat gives me more highly than anything
coming out of Redmond - my cat can't tell me anything wrong.
 
A

Al Klein

Thanks, Craig. In a perfect world, pdf wouldn't exist.

In a perfect world pdf would exist - Adobe wouldn't. Money wouldn't.
We'd all do what we were best at and get what we needed, die at a very
old age, completely healthy, vigorous and alert until the last moment,
when we'd simply go to sleep and not wake up.

Oh, wait a minute - someone tried something like that (the first part,
anyway) and it didn't work. I guess the world's not perfect after
all.
 
D

Daniel Mandic

Al said:
In a perfect world pdf would exist - Adobe wouldn't. Money wouldn't.
We'd all do what we were best at and get what we needed, die at a very
old age, completely healthy, vigorous and alert until the last moment,
when we'd simply go to sleep and not wake up.

Oh, wait a minute - someone tried something like that (the first part,
anyway) and it didn't work. I guess the world's not perfect after
all.


Hi Al!


erm..

I know our last Kardinal. He got Ninetynine. Healthy, vigourous and
alert to the last. Except, he had not need the (your) very first :)

Adobe is making good Software, as Microsoft does. When it is not
satisfying enough to you, then do not use it. Both are offering
demo-versions (e.g. XP 30days, AcrobatReader etc..)!!




Best Regards,

Daniel Mandic
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top