Dumb question on naming a .NET development group

[Ray Stevens]

This may seen trivial, but I am wondering if anyone has a good name for
their .NET development group. "Client Server" is too old fashioned, "Open
Systems" too UNIX biased, and "Web Development" too narrow if the
development group also develops desktop applications, WinForms, And TabletPC
products (such as we do).

(FYI: We are being asked to come up with a new name)

 

[clintonG]

Ours was Visual Studio Developers Group.

<%= Clinton Gallagher
METROmilwaukee (sm) "A Regional Information Service"
NET csgallagher AT metromilwaukee.com
URL http://metromilwaukee.com/
URL http://clintongallagher.metromilwaukee.com/

 

[Guest]

NETFramework development group?
(its the only bit that hasnt had DotNet dropped!)

 

[AMDRIT]

NetShack? Hehe, like RadioShack (You've got questions, we've got answers.)
Bob? "Hey, how do I implement a worker thread?" "I dunno, better ask Bob."
MSOOP? too many meanings come to mind with this one.
WinWebMart? shopping for answers.
AsyncCallback? No blocking happening here.
WorkingJava? just a dig really.



Sorry, just messing around.

 

[Jon Shemitz]

This may seen trivial, but I am wondering if anyone has a good name for
their .NET development group. "Client Server" is too old fashioned, "Open
Systems" too UNIX biased, and "Web Development" too narrow if the
development group also develops desktop applications, WinForms, And TabletPC
products (such as we do).

"Trusted Systems"
"Managed Systems"
"Rapid Application Development"
".NET Development"
"On Time, Under Budget"