Disarming UAC

  • Thread starter D. Spencer Hines
  • Start date
D

D. Spencer Hines

UAC, from all accounts here, seems to be worse than having three
mothers-in-law on one's neck all the time.

It seems to be the "Can't Do" Feature Writ Large.

Can it just be disarmed and told to go stand in the corner with face to the
wall -- while STILL maintaining ALL the User Access Control features we
ALREADY have in XP Pro?

DSH
 
M

MeNotKnow

Have you tried clicking "Turn user account control on or off" in the User
Accounts window? That might do the trick.
 
W

...winston

Your properties indicate XP and OE. Trolling as usual by crossposting across XP and Vista groups ?
Cross posting removed.
Until Vista is installed try Googling
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Vista+UAC+disable

...winston

: UAC, from all accounts here, seems to be worse than having three
: mothers-in-law on one's neck all the time.
:
: It seems to be the "Can't Do" Feature Writ Large.
:
: Can it just be disarmed and told to go stand in the corner with face to the
: wall -- while STILL maintaining ALL the User Access Control features we
: ALREADY have in XP Pro?
:
: DSH
:
:
 
D

DevilsPGD

In message <#[email protected]> "D. Spencer Hines"
UAC, from all accounts here, seems to be worse than having three
mothers-in-law on one's neck all the time.

It seems to be the "Can't Do" Feature Writ Large.

Can it just be disarmed and told to go stand in the corner with face to the
wall -- while STILL maintaining ALL the User Access Control features we
ALREADY have in XP Pro?

Yes, just turn it off.
 
S

Synapse Syndrome

D. Spencer Hines said:
UAC, from all accounts here, seems to be worse than having three
mothers-in-law on one's neck all the time.

It seems to be the "Can't Do" Feature Writ Large.

Can it just be disarmed and told to go stand in the corner with face to
the wall -- while STILL maintaining ALL the User Access Control features
we ALREADY have in XP Pro?


UAC has big security benefits, not least making IE7 run in its own user
space with Protected Mode. Try this instead of disabling UAC:

http://www.tweakvista.eu/show_tweak.php?tweak=84

ss.
 
M

mikeyhsd

no he cannot do that.
would rather whine and whine.

(e-mail address removed)@sport.rr.com

Have you tried clicking "Turn user account control on or off" in the User
Accounts window? That might do the trick.
 
S

Someguy

On Wed, 7 Mar 2007 23:44:17 -0000, "Synapse Syndrome"


D. Spencer Hines said:
UAC, from all accounts here, seems to be worse than having three
mothers-in-law on one's neck all the time.

It seems to be the "Can't Do" Feature Writ Large.

Can it just be disarmed and told to go stand in the corner with face to
the wall -- while STILL maintaining ALL the User Access Control features
we ALREADY have in XP Pro?


UAC has big security benefits, not least making IE7 run in its own
user
space with Protected Mode. Try this instead of disabling UAC:

http://www.tweakvista.eu/show_tweak.php?tweak=84

ss.


If you set it up the way that site says you still are unable to save
your settings or save your progress in a game such as Doom 3. Running
the shortcut or the exe in admin mode does nothing. The only way I can
see is to install all of your prorams in the users directory for you
to have permissions to save. Anyone else notice this?
 
D

D. Spencer Hines

Yes, I've read all the Microsoft, et al., marketing boilerplate on this.

It's not very helpful.

The key aspect I'm looking at currently is whether I can still have all the
User Access Controls that we have in XP Pro SP2 if I just turn the damned
UAC in Vista off....

AND what potential vulnerabilities that will/might open me up to.

Can anyone here speak from experience on those issues?

I do not need the nagging pop-up reminders designed for doofuses who
kvetch ---- "I deleted a file I shouldn't have because Microsoft didn't warn
me three times!"...

The Doofus American "I Am A Victim" Mentality -- that all stalwarts loathe
and treat with extreme contempt.

DSH

Lux et Veritas et Libertas
 
J

Jupiter Jones [MVP]

"from all accounts here"
Really? All?
You seem to selective read.

If you look again, you will see the other side.
But it seems that is not the issue since you choose to cross post this
to an irrelevant newsgroup.
Why does someone like you who knows better, deliberately cross post to
an irrelevant newsgroup?

UAC has not been a problem for me since Vista was a Beta.
It continually got better as Vista progressed to the point now where I
rarely see it.
I saw it a lot as I set up RTM several months ago, but since then
rarely.
UAC seems to work well for me.
 
A

Adam Albright

"from all accounts here"
Really? All?
You seem to selective read.

If you look again, you will see the other side.
But it seems that is not the issue since you choose to cross post this
to an irrelevant newsgroup.
Why does someone like you who knows better, deliberately cross post to
an irrelevant newsgroup?

UAC has not been a problem for me since Vista was a Beta.

Really? Well lucky you. If you bothered to read some other posts, oh,
maybe a 1,000 or so just here in this newsgroup over the last several
weeks you would have learned a lot of people have issues with UAC. I
would think a MVP would know better then to jump to conclusions that
oh, look, it works for me, it must work for everyone.
 
J

Jupiter Jones [MVP]

I NEVER suggested no one had issues with UAC.

It also seems you do not like examples that don't fit the image you
imagine and think.

Or do you believe "UAC, from all accounts here..."
Do you only see the negative?
There are others, read them also for a change.

"...it works for me, it must work for everyone."
More of your imagination, I NEVER suggested that either.
But twisting the meaning of posts must do something for you.

Read my post again for the first time.
 
G

Guest

Adam Albright said:
Really? Well lucky you. If you bothered to read some other posts, oh,
maybe a 1,000 or so just here in this newsgroup over the last several
weeks you would have learned a lot of people have issues with UAC. I
would think a MVP would know better then to jump to conclusions that
oh, look, it works for me, it must work for everyone.
I see a lot of people don't like it but that is different from having
"issues."
It works as advertises although is a pain in the ass when setting up your
system.
 
L

Lang Murphy

C'mon, Adam, you're a bright guy... folks having "issues" with UAC does not
make UAC "bad"... maybe for them, but not for me.

Lang
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top