core system

G

Guest

Hello


Is it a good idea to keep core system in memory? I have xp home sp2 and
1G of memory.
thanks much
harley
--

Aspire X-Superalien 500W
Asus P4c800E Deluxe
Intel P-4 800 3.0G 1mb cache
Crucial 2x 512MB DDR400
2x WD 80GB Sata 150 7200rpm 8M
Ati Radeon 9800XT 256MB
Audigy 2ZS
Windows XP , home
 
L

larry jordan

Hello


Shoot , I read on one of these xp home tweak and tips web site that
keeping the core system in ram would give me better perforance. below is
the instructions they gave to do it.


Launch the Registry Editor (Regedit.exe).
Go to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\
Session Manager\Memory Management.
Double-click DisablePagingExecutive DWORD value.
Change the value in the Value Data text box from 0 to 1, and click OK.
Close the Registry Editor
thanks
larry
 
U

Uncle Grumpy

larry jordan said:
Shoot , I read on one of these xp home tweak and tips web site that
keeping the core system in ram would give me better perforance. below is
the instructions they gave to do it.

Cite the site, if you would be so kind.
 
B

Bob I

dobey said:
The other article cited infered some kind of performance increase - though
this article suggests a performance hit on machines with large amounts of
RAM.

hmmm...

"Decreasing response time" is a performance increase, NOT a performance hit.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Similar Threads

hotmail 6
regedit 32
newsgroup 4
workstation , xp 1
registry key 10
giveaway computer 2
msinfo32 6
application 12

Top