Saucy said:
Each of the few times I've tried to install Windows Vista onto a partition
formatted NTFS with cluster size ove 4KB (e.g. 8KB or 32KB), the Windows
Vista installer refuses to allow Vista to go on said partition.
Hi Saucy,
I'm not 100% sure, but I suspect it cannot be done. In previous versions of
Windows, installation worked by creating files and directories on top of the
file system (ie using file system APIs). Vista uses an "image-based"
installation method, where the new installation is written to disk as
physical blocks. This is how Vista was able to greatly reduce its
installation time - no messing around with high-level data structures. The
flip-side is that installation probably assumes a default block size of the
disk, ie, 4K.
I agree with my respected colleague Synapse Syndrome, that a larger block
size would be counter-productive on the system volume. I've experiemented
with different block sizes over the years, but my overall expereince was
that 8K or larger is only useful for improving performance in very, very
specific scenarios: mainly, contiguous streaming data from large files - ie,
a media server. Even databases with very large database files didn't really
benefit, because the read-write pattern was still scattered throughout the
file, not long stretches of contiguous chunks.
If you're running a scenario which would benefit from larger block size,
you'll certainly want to keep the data on a different volume to the boot
volume, anyway.
If you want to play with different block sizes just for the hell of it - hey
by all means, go for it! That's what I did
But don't expect to see
significant changes in performance; and (apparently) don't expect to change
the Windows system drive from the defualt 4k.
Hope it helps,