Theslaz said:
Using version 10. Tried to validate the archive before I did the
restore. The progress bar indicated that it would take 36 days. This
was a 44 Gig file. Stopped the restore process and tried it again
without validating. Took 6 hours before it crashed.
No big deal. My computer was running before this attempted restore; it
was just a bit confused. I was able to save and move all the files
that I assumed I would need just in case. I have restored my computer
before from scratch and I know what to do. I had manually saved all my
data files and anything else that was necessary e.g. email and browser
on my external drive. I was up and running with a clean system within
6 hours. Just pisses me of that IT didn't preform like it was supposed
to.
I'd be pissed, too.
In my experience, it took me an extremely long time (16 hours if I
recall) to restore an image using the Linux-based Acronis boot CD with a
friend's laptop that only had a USB 1.0 connection. I was able to divide
the restore time by three by using a Windows-based Bart PE CD with the
Acronis plugin. Still, I wasn't exactly thrilled with how long the
restore took. But with my desktop PC (which is newer and has USB 2.0),
the restore process lasts about thirty minutes (that's an estimate; it's
been a while since I needed to restore).
FWIW, and this is for the benefit of others, the time to validate the
archive is immediately after it's created. This way you will know right
off the bat if you can trust it.
I've used DriveImageXML and I like it. Of course it lacks the capability
of making incremental images, but it's good for what it does. If you
don't change your system that much (by installing new programs) and you
have a comprehensive data backup plan, your method seems sound. If
Acronis TI worked for you, I'm sure you'd prefer it (it's easier,
quicker, and it's just one program rather than two). Sorry to hear about
your negative experience.
I use version 9. I wonder if others can report on experiences with newer
versions with respect to USB speed.