AV wanted for Win95 through to XP Pro

[Andy]

Recommendations requested for Anti-Virus for small business network
incorporating aprox 25 PCs with mix of 95, 98SE, Millennium, NT4 and XP Pro.
Centralised update management preferred but not essential.

thanks in advance,

 

[Maximum Dog3]

Recommendations requested for Anti-Virus for small business network
incorporating aprox 25 PCs with mix of 95, 98SE, Millennium, NT4 and XP Pro.
Centralised update management preferred but not essential.

http://www.eset.com/

 

[David H. Lipman]

From: "Andy" <andy@dkw>

| Recommendations requested for Anti-Virus for small business network
| incorporating aprox 25 PCs with mix of 95, 98SE, Millennium, NT4 and XP Pro.
| Centralised update management preferred but not essential.

| thanks in advance,
| --
| Andy



A business still using Win95 ?

You are joking -- Right ?

 

[Andy]

From: "Andy" <andy@dkw>

| Recommendations requested for Anti-Virus for small business network
| incorporating aprox 25 PCs with mix of 95, 98SE, Millennium, NT4 and XP
Pro.
| Centralised update management preferred but not essential.

| thanks in advance,
| --
| Andy



A business still using Win95 ?

You are joking -- Right ?

This machine is running dedicated CMM (Co-ordinate Measuring Machine)
software and was supplied by the machine tool manufacturer with the machine.


Andy

 

[Pegleg]

Recommendations requested for Anti-Virus for small business network
incorporating aprox 25 PCs with mix of 95, 98SE, Millennium, NT4 and XP Pro.
Centralised update management preferred but not essential.

thanks in advance,

Get rid of the PCs running95/98SE/Millennium/NT4 first.
No current, av program worth its salt will support that combination.

 

[Pegleg]

This machine is running dedicated CMM (Co-ordinate Measuring Machine)
software and was supplied by the machine tool manufacturer with the machine.

Get them to update their software or change equipment! Is it necessary
for that machine to be on the network?

 

[David H. Lipman]

From: "Pegleg" <[email protected]>


|
| Get rid of the PCs running95/98SE/Millennium/NT4 first.
| No current, av program worth its salt will support that combination.

I agree.

 

[wasted]

Recommendations requested for Anti-Virus for small business network
incorporating aprox 25 PCs with mix of 95, 98SE, Millennium, NT4 and
XP Pro. Centralised update management preferred but not essential.

thanks in advance,

Not sure if this will do all you want, but all of your windows versions are
mentioned

http://www.avast.com/eng/avast_4_professional.html

 

[Virus Guy]

Recommendations requested for Anti-Virus for small business
network incorporating aprox 25 PCs with mix of 95, 98SE,
Millennium, NT4 and XP Pro.

Norton Anti-Virus (NAV) version 2001 or 2002.

Don't let the age of the product fool you. If you install NAV 2001 or
2002, and once you perform the first on-line update, the product will
update itself with the latest scan engine and virus definition files.

NAV 2001 and 2002 have very small resource utilization, unlike newer
versions.

I have used NAV 2002 on all the OS's you have listed except win-95 and
win-me, but I expect it to work on those as well.

NAV 2001 or 2002 is available on a stand-alone product, or as part of
Norton System Works (NSW) 2001 and 2002. They are available on
torrents, p2p, etc.

The product does not require registration or validation to be
functional or to update itself.

Once installed, the product will begin a 1 year (365 day) countdown at
which point it will tell you to purchase an additional year of update
service, which you can avoid by un-installing and re-installing the
product and obtain another year of update service.

Centralised update management preferred but not essential.

You can configure the product to seek out and install updates on a
schedule.

 

[Offbreed]

From: "Andy" <andy@dkw>

| Recommendations requested for Anti-Virus for small business network
| incorporating aprox 25 PCs with mix of 95, 98SE, Millennium, NT4 and XP Pro.
| Centralised update management preferred but not essential.

| thanks in advance,
| --
| Andy



A business still using Win95 ?

You are joking -- Right ?

I was a little startled by it needing an anti virus, but if it was
isolated:

http://www.litepc.com/

 

[Pegleg]

Norton Anti-Virus (NAV) version 2001 or 2002.

Don't let the age of the product fool you. If you install NAV 2001 or
2002, and once you perform the first on-line update, the product will
update itself with the latest scan engine and virus definition files.

NAV has hosed more systems than any other AV application. Use at your
own risk...especially on the wreck of a system you have.

 

[Phil Weldon]

'Andy' wrote:
| This machine is running dedicated CMM (Co-ordinate Measuring Machine)
| software and was supplied by the machine tool manufacturer with the
machine
_____

Any critical systems that MUST run on an obsolete operating system because
of propriety software should either be disconnected from any network OR if a
Local Area Network connection is a requirement then the systems should be
kept behind a security server that creates a DMZ. This will make these
systems AND the more up-to-date systems on other Local Area Networks more
secure.

For a machine tool controller application that runs on hardware that
supports Windows 95 you should also be in discussion with the provider about
onward migration.

Phil Weldon

|
|
| | > From: "Andy" <andy@dkw>
| >
| > | Recommendations requested for Anti-Virus for small business network
| > | incorporating aprox 25 PCs with mix of 95, 98SE, Millennium, NT4 and
XP
| > Pro.
| > | Centralised update management preferred but not essential.
| >
| > | thanks in advance,
| > | --
| > | Andy
| >
| >
| >
| > A business still using Win95 ?
| >
| > You are joking -- Right ?
| >
| > --
| > Dave
| > http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
| > http://www.ik-cs.com/got-a-virus.htm
| >
| >
| This machine is running dedicated CMM (Co-ordinate Measuring Machine)
| software and was supplied by the machine tool manufacturer with the
machine.
|
|
| Andy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

 

[Ian]

Any critical systems that MUST run on an obsolete operating system because
of propriety software should either be disconnected from any network OR if
a
Local Area Network connection is a requirement then the systems should be
kept behind a security server that creates a DMZ. This will make these
systems AND the more up-to-date systems on other Local Area Networks more
secure.

For a machine tool controller application that runs on hardware that
supports Windows 95 you should also be in discussion with the provider
about
onward migration.

Hi Phil,

I'm in a similar position to the OP, except the machine isn't connected to
the network. I've been thinking about running the application in a virtual
machine running Win95 on more reliable hardware, would this be possible?
There is no provider anymore and being a very small company having someone
re-write the application isn't feasible.

I know nothing about virtualisation really except having tinkered with
Gentoo running in Microsoft's Virtual PC on my pc at home.

All help appreciated.

 

[Frankster]

Trend Micro Officescan, hands down!

http://www.antivirus.com

-Frank

 

[Virus Guy]

Any critical systems that MUST run on an obsolete operating
system because of propriety software should either be
disconnected from any network OR if a Local Area Network
connection is a requirement then the systems should be
kept behind a security server that creates a DMZ.

This is typical IT thinking. This is why IT departments rule
organizations from their underground dungeons. Because they are
allowed to. Because they've got senior administrators wrapped around
their fingers.

Even though they brought XP into their organizations, that faulty
operating system, that abomination, that abortion that called itself
secure.

The truth is that win-9x, that "obsolete" OS, was more secure than
those stupid NT-based OS's turned out to be.

 

[Virus Guy]

I'm in a similar position to the OP, except the machine isn't
connected to the network. I've been thinking about running
the application in a virtual machine running Win95 on more
reliable hardware, would this be possible?

Are you a sadomasochist?

Have you ever heard of "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" ?

 

[Phil Weldon]

'Virus Guy' wrote, in part:
| This is typical IT thinking.
_____

Your post misses the point.

Phil Weldon

| Phil Weldon wrote:
|
| > Any critical systems that MUST run on an obsolete operating
| > system because of propriety software should either be
| > disconnected from any network OR if a Local Area Network
| > connection is a requirement then the systems should be
| > kept behind a security server that creates a DMZ.
|
| This is typical IT thinking. This is why IT departments rule
| organizations from their underground dungeons. Because they are
| allowed to. Because they've got senior administrators wrapped around
| their fingers.
|
| Even though they brought XP into their organizations, that faulty
| operating system, that abomination, that abortion that called itself
| secure.
|
| The truth is that win-9x, that "obsolete" OS, was more secure than
| those stupid NT-based OS's turned out to be.

 

[Offbreed]

'Virus Guy' wrote, in part:
| This is typical IT thinking.
_____

Your post misses the point.

Which is what?

 

[Phil Weldon]

'Offbreed' wrote:
| Which is what?
_____

Evidently, for the original poster, the system running Windows 95 is a
machine controller running proprietary software. At a certain point new
computers may no longer run the software, the operating system, and possibly
the interface. Machine tool control involves a lot of sharp metal moving at
high speeds ... errors can be catastrophic. The 'Virus Guy' post is a
misaimed rant.

Phil Weldon

| Phil Weldon wrote:
| > 'Virus Guy' wrote, in part:
| > | This is typical IT thinking.
| > _____
| >
| > Your post misses the point.
|

 

[Ian]

Are you a sadomasochist?

Have you ever heard of "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" ?

But it WILL get to a point where it is broke and we'll be stuffed. That's
why I would like to explore virtualisation on modern hardware now - it's
called contingency planning.