A
Artificer
Any idea if MS will try to promote Silverlight over ASP.NET for web
development or will silverlight remain just as a adobe's flash like
tecnology?
development or will silverlight remain just as a adobe's flash like
tecnology?
Any idea if MS will try to promote Silverlight over ASP.NET for web
development or will silverlight remain just as a adobe's flash like
tecnology?
Artificer said:Any idea if MS will try to promote Silverlight over ASP.NET for web
development or will silverlight remain just as a adobe's flash like
tecnology?
Blackhand said:I hardly think Silverlight will replace ASP.Net, because truly rich applications
can be developed using them in conjunction with each other.
It also needs to be taken into account that most people don't like installing
plugins in their browser, so large scale uptake will be slow.
Personally I would still prefer to do back office applications without
Silverlight. Myself and the other seniors at our company still aren't
particularly thrilled with Silverlight.
Silverlight 2.0 will likely be a big thing, like LINQ to SQL, until people start
using it in enterprise applications and start taking all the extra implications
into account.
opposed to displaying content).Juan T. Llibre said:re:
!> Simply put HTML is just not the right platform to deliver a UI (as
If you mean a *Rich User Interface* or *Rich Interactive Applications*,
I agree, but there's a lot of adequate HTML-based UI's on the web now.
If there's a need for visual demonstrations, Silverlight/Flash can't be beat,
and Silverlight certainly does a lot more than Flash does, but for data-driven
online catalogs/shopping carts, and/or any website which doesn't have the
need to visually demonstrate concepts or products, Silverlight/Flash are
overhead-producing overkill.
When it comes to giving clients quick data and purchasing choices,
platforms which deliver HTML to clients, like ASP.NET does,
are much more efficient and quick-loading than either Silverlight or Flash.
Juan T. Llibre said:I'll agree to the extent that there's a lot of work to be done on Silverlight,
and that its future, if the promise made can be delivered, may be bright.
There's no way that Silverlight can compete in throughput efficiency with ASP.NET, though.
Silverlight is a bandwidth-intensive platform, hardly suitable for business needs.
As far as eye-candy goes, it's alright, though.
Alvin Bruney said:search engines just need to evolve. no biggie.
--
Regards,
Alvin Bruney [MVP ASP.NET]
[Shameless Author plug]
The O.W.C. Black Book, 2nd Edition
Exclusively on www.lulu.com/owc $19.99
-------------------------------------------------------
Blackhand said:Another problem that's getting overlooked, is that search engine spiders can't parse the content of
flash/silverlight.
For a lot of our clients that would be reason enough not to go for a full on Silverlight solution (your site is only
as good as its traffic). Yes there are ways to improve search engine friendliness, bottom line is, unfortunately, the
spider still can't crawl the content and rank your page anywhere near as well as if it was HTML.
Juan T. Llibre said:re:
!> I can't see any reason why the same can't apply in to a Silverlight app in the future.
Let me know when it's ready.
<chuckle>
Blackhand said:Another problem that's getting overlooked, is that search engine
spiders can't parse the content of flash/silverlight.
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.