Ars Technical on Mono development

B

Baja Jones

http://arstechnica.com/etc/linux/index.html


Conclusion

As you can clearly see, Mono brings almost limitless possibilities in
breaking down the barrier between desktops: a commercial software
provider would target Mono and it would "just work" on all platforms
that Mono supported. How is this different from Java? In my opinion Java
makes things harder than it needs to be. For starters, enforced
exception handling can't auto-box/unbox primitive types and doesn't
support arbitrary length parameter lists String.Format() style.

The framework of Mono provides the ability to make a very tedious task
in C/C++ almost trivial in C#. As the above example, RegEx, shows, it
helps the programmer concentrate on the program itself, rather than the
logic supporting the code.
 
B

bob holder

Baja Jones said:
http://arstechnica.com/etc/linux/index.html


Conclusion

As you can clearly see, Mono brings almost limitless possibilities in
breaking down the barrier between desktops: a commercial software
provider would target Mono and it would "just work" on all platforms
that Mono supported. How is this different from Java? In my opinion Java
makes things harder than it needs to be. For starters, enforced
exception handling can't auto-box/unbox primitive types and doesn't
support arbitrary length parameter lists String.Format() style.

The framework of Mono provides the ability to make a very tedious task
in C/C++ almost trivial in C#. As the above example, RegEx, shows, it
helps the programmer concentrate on the program itself, rather than the
logic supporting the code.

That's if you can get to your code. I'm still trying to get mono built. So
far it's been an endless dependency chain. Last nights session was wrapped
around libgdiplus, gtk+, gtk2, glib, ...
good luck.
bob
 
B

Baja Jones

bob said:
That's if you can get to your code. I'm still trying to get mono built. So
far it's been an endless dependency chain. Last nights session was wrapped
around libgdiplus, gtk+, gtk2, glib, ...
good luck.
bob

The sad thing is : the Windows installation is a helluva lot simpler !

It's just two standard setup.exe's -- one for mono, one for GTK !
 
L

Linux Nightmare

Baja Jones said:
http://arstechnica.com/etc/linux/index.html


Conclusion

As you can clearly see, Mono brings almost limitless possibilities in
breaking down the barrier between desktops: a commercial software
provider would target Mono and it would "just work" on all platforms
that Mono supported. How is this different from Java? In my opinion Java
makes things harder than it needs to be. For starters, enforced
exception handling can't auto-box/unbox primitive types and doesn't
support arbitrary length parameter lists String.Format() style.

The framework of Mono provides the ability to make a very tedious task
in C/C++ almost trivial in C#. As the above example, RegEx, shows, it
helps the programmer concentrate on the program itself, rather than the
logic supporting the code.

What a ****ing joke. First Gnome and now this worthless POS.
 
T

Tom Shelton

The sad thing is : the Windows installation is a helluva lot simpler !

It's just two standard setup.exe's -- one for mono, one for GTK !

It was really easy to install on gentoo as well...
 
C

Christer Carlsson

bob said:
That's if you can get to your code. I'm still trying to get mono built. So
far it's been an endless dependency chain. Last nights session was wrapped
around libgdiplus, gtk+, gtk2, glib, ...
good luck.
bob

Thats why I love gentoo and its portage tree, just emerge mono...

Calle
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top