T
Tony Johansson
Hello!
I just wonder what do I miss if I only have VS2005 without having
..NET 1.1 installed ?
According to Jon Skeet he said that it makes sense to have both 1.1 and 2.0
installed.
When installing VS2005 you automatically get .NET 2.0 but not .NET 1.1.
//Tony
I just wonder what do I miss if I only have VS2005 without having
..NET 1.1 installed ?
According to Jon Skeet he said that it makes sense to have both 1.1 and 2.0
installed.
When installing VS2005 you automatically get .NET 2.0 but not .NET 1.1.
With VS2005 you get .NET 2.0.
With VS2008 you get .NET 3.5.
Remember that 2.0 and 3.5 frameworks include all previous versions too.
Not really - .NET 2.0 doesn't include .NET 1.1, which has a different
CLR. The framework libraries of .NET 2.0 include all the framework
ibraries of 1.1, but that's not quite the same thing.
In particular, it makes sense to have both 1.1 and 2.0 installed, but
when you install .NET 3.5 it supercedes .NET 2.0 and .NET
//Tony