WindowsXP office 2007. Free on the net . WHy pay?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nosugarintea
  • Start date Start date
THe land we live on was stolen from the indians. Stealing works. We
steal the air . we steal the water. we steal a look at a beautiful
girl. stealing is sublime.
 
the following in
THe land we live on was stolen from the indians. Stealing works. We
steal the air . we steal the water. we steal a look at a beautiful
girl. stealing is sublime.


Well, you've slightly extended the meaning of stealing to the poetic usage.
No human spent hours of their time developing air and water and your eyes
belong to you.

Yes, the land you live on may have been stolen from the Indians, but that is
someone else's crime, not yours.
 
THe land we live on was stolen from the indians. Stealing works. We
steal the air . we steal the water. we steal a look at a beautiful
girl. stealing is sublime.

Fortunately most people are not like you, they have values and won't steal.
 
THe land we live on was stolen from the indians. Stealing works. We
steal the air . we steal the water. we steal a look at a beautiful
girl. stealing is sublime.

Alright, I'll bite.

According to you, are there ever any times when stealing is wrong?
 
Has more to do with marginal utility of money. values are arbitrary and
meaningless. people only adhere to values if it is in their interest.
if you have a good job, you can afford values.
 
the following in
Has more to do with marginal utility of money. values are arbitrary and
meaningless. people only adhere to values if it is in their interest.
if you have a good job, you can afford values.



Actually it's often poorer people who have stronger morals. They are freer
from the excesses that come with having more money than you need for your
own good.

But personally I wouldn't download Office 2007 even if it was completely
legal and free. If it's not THE most boring application on earth, it's
certainly very high up in the rankings.
 
Has more to do with marginal utility of money. values are arbitrary and
meaningless. people only adhere to values if it is in their interest.
if you have a good job, you can afford values.

Nothing else needs be said. Situational ethics are a sad thing.
 
Using your belief that others stole long ago to justify your own stealing
today.
Other references you use to stealing are clearly WRONG or have such a
different meaning they can not possibly compare to what you suggest.
I am glad very few believe as you, for if many did, we would live in total
anarchy.

Also, your association of "good job" and "values" is only another falsehood
you use to justify your activity.

Please post details of your current residence so your opinions can be passed
to your neighbors.
Or are you afraid of what the truth would do to your relationship?
 
So are you going to tell your neighbors as I suggested in my other post?
Or are you afraid of the truth as well as integrity?
What philosophy class advocates stealing just because you believe "Hilarious
how the rich people dont want poor people to have software"?

--
Jupiter Jones [MVP]
http://www3.telus.net/dandemar
http://www.dts-l.org
 
nosugarintea said:
http://$harethef1le$.com/forum/v1ewtop1c.php?t=56698

Hilarious how the rich people dont want poor people to have
software.
Hilarious how the people with low standards try to justify
stealing.
http://$harethef1le$.com/forum/v1ewtop1c.php?t=34125

IF you dont have something constructive to say, pls dont say
anything. Morality is relative. ANy first year philosophy student
knows that. There are no absolutes in this world.

Correct.
There are no absolutes in this world.
You posted your opinion on a public discussion newsgroup that is distributed
to many servers around the world and expected what?

Whatever you expected - it is not absolute.
You get whatever those responding want to give you.

What may be constructive may not be what you want to hear.
What you may consider to be constructive - others may consider garbage.
Calgary area morality may be different from Burnaby area morality.

You are demanding others not present their thoughts on the matter.
Why?
 
Just trying to give them a lesson in thriftyness. Society is a zero-sum
game. I just dont get why there is not more violence. I guess we are
sheep.
 
"thriftyness" is not the same as stealing.
Your comparison between the two is strange at best.

As for violence, convince more to your beliefs and you will see much more in
the ensuing anarchy.
 
nosugarintea said:
http://$harethef1le$.com/forum/v1ewtop1c.php?t=56698

Hilarious how the rich people dont want poor people to have
software.
Hilarious how the people with low standards try to justify
stealing.
http://$harethef1le$.com/forum/v1ewtop1c.php?t=34125

IF you dont have something constructive to say, pls dont say
anything. Morality is relative. ANy first year philosophy student
knows that. There are no absolutes in this world.

Shenan said:
Correct.
There are no absolutes in this world.
You posted your opinion on a public discussion newsgroup that is
distributed to many servers around the world and expected what?

Whatever you expected - it is not absolute.
You get whatever those responding want to give you.

What may be constructive may not be what you want to hear.
What you may consider to be constructive - others may consider
garbage. Calgary area morality may be different from Burnaby area
morality.

You are demanding others not present their thoughts on the matter.
Why?
Just trying to give them a lesson in thriftyness. Society is a
zero-sum game. I just dont get why there is not more violence. I
guess we are sheep.

I fail to see any teachings here.
http://m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?va=thriftiness

Life is mostly a zero-sum situation.
http://m-w.com/dictionary/zero-sum

Why isn't there more violence?
Intelligence. Experience. The desire to live.

You demanded that others not say anything - not state their opinions.
To me - that is you asking for sheep.
 
http://sharethefiles.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=34125

IF you dont have something constructive to say, pls dont say anything.
Morality is relative. ANy first year philosophy student knows that.

Anyone intent on living by exploiting others instead of earning what
they want might maintain that.
There are no absolutes in this world.

Sure there are. One is the metabolically challenged state you are
likely to find yourself in if you steal enough from the wrong people.
 
Back
Top