Today, John John made these interesting comments ...
Google on the section and read it! The right to make software
backups is not extended to music, movies and other artistic
works. As for software if the software package has some sort
of copy protection then it would have to be tested in the
courts as to whether or not the authors are obliged to provide
means of creating backups. If one were to force the copy
protection in order to make a legal archive or backup copy of
the software I doubt that any court in the US would rule
against the defendant because he or she has the right to make
an archive copy of the software. How the copy is made is
irrelevant.
Isn't this basically an academic discussion? I didn't know that
the backup law exempted "artistic works" but it doesn't surprise
me, the music and movie industry has such a lock on the current
pro-big business administration that the little guy must run
second chair.
But, unless you could find an attorney to take your software "I
can't back it up" case on a contingency basis, wouldn't it be
simpler and far cheaper to just buy another copy of it? Lawyers
START at about $250/hour and just a casual chat with one would
cost you more than Vista, and about 1/3 what an expensive app
like PhotoShop CS costs. You'd have the satisfaction of forcing
the defendent company into submission, but it seems unlikely that
a precedent could be set unless you go at least to an appellate
court. And, if you did get a ruling in your favor at a lower
court, I would think the developer would automatically appeal the
decision, again costing you more time and money. That, coupled
with court case loads running into the years, by the time you
eventually prevailed against MS on Vista, you could start all
over again with Vienna.
Similar "arguments" can be made for upholding your basic rights
as defined in such documents as the Constitution's Bill of
Rights. I suppose you could prevail, but it would be expensive.
And then there's the cases where some Internet company, e.g.,
ISP, NSP, eBay, whomever, sanctions you by terminating your
account or other punishment through their belief you are in some
bullshit violation of their TOS/AUP, again, one might be able to
prevail in court. Eventually. But, at the price attorney's
charge, it is simpler, cheaper, and less frustrating to just suck
it up and find some other company that will do what you want them
to do.