Why?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ~BD~
  • Start date Start date
B

~BD~

Peter Foldes said:
go to 202.177.16.121
Click to expand...

IP address: 202.177.16.121
Reverse DNS: 202-177-16-121.kdd.net.hk.
Reverse DNS authenticity: XXXXX Could be forged: hostname
202-177-16-121.kdd.net.hk. does not exist]XXXXX
ASN: 7479
ASN Name: KDDHK-AS-AP (KDD HONG KONG LIMITED)
IP range connectivity: 1
Registrar (per ASN): APNIC
Country (per IP registrar): HK [Hong Kong]
Country Currency: HKD [Hong Kong Dollars]
Country IP Range: 202.177.0.0 to 202.177.31.255
Country fraud profile: Normal
City (per outside source): Unknown
Country (per outside source): -- []
Private (internal) IP? No
IP address registrar: whois.apnic.net
Known Proxy? No
Link for WHOIS: 202.177.16.121
 
Peter Foldes said:
go to 202.177.16.121
Click to expand...

IP address: 202.177.16.121
Reverse DNS: 202-177-16-121.kdd.net.hk.
Reverse DNS authenticity: XXXXX Could be forged: hostname
202-177-16-121.kdd.net.hk. does not exist]XXXXX
ASN: 7479
ASN Name: KDDHK-AS-AP (KDD HONG KONG LIMITED)
IP range connectivity: 1
Registrar (per ASN): APNIC
Country (per IP registrar): HK [Hong Kong]
Country Currency: HKD [Hong Kong Dollars]
Country IP Range: 202.177.0.0 to 202.177.31.255
Country fraud profile: Normal
City (per outside source): Unknown
Country (per outside source): -- []
Private (internal) IP? No
IP address registrar: whois.apnic.net
Known Proxy? No
Link for WHOIS: 202.177.16.121
Click to expand...
 
Yes, why are we posting whois information for this IP address?

--
/¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
\\
\\ Colton
\\ http://explosion.debug-inc.com
// (e-mail address removed)
//
\\ PHP/VB6/HTML/CSS/Javascript/IIS/Apache
\\ Vista Home Premium User
//
// Anytime support, via email. (Do not spam.)
//
\____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Twayne said:
Peter Foldes said:
go to 202.177.16.121
Click to expand...

IP address: 202.177.16.121
Reverse DNS: 202-177-16-121.kdd.net.hk.
Reverse DNS authenticity: XXXXX Could be forged: hostname
202-177-16-121.kdd.net.hk. does not exist]XXXXX
ASN: 7479
ASN Name: KDDHK-AS-AP (KDD HONG KONG LIMITED)
IP range connectivity: 1
Registrar (per ASN): APNIC
Country (per IP registrar): HK [Hong Kong]
Country Currency: HKD [Hong Kong Dollars]
Country IP Range: 202.177.0.0 to 202.177.31.255
Country fraud profile: Normal
City (per outside source): Unknown
Country (per outside source): -- []
Private (internal) IP? No
IP address registrar: whois.apnic.net
Known Proxy? No
Link for WHOIS: 202.177.16.121
Click to expand...
 
Yes, why are we posting whois information for this IP address?

--

Just a silly idea of mine in view of the fact that the authenticity of
the URL seemed questionable, viz:-

Reverse DNS authenticity: **** Could be forged: hostname ****
202-177-16-121.kdd.net.hk. does not exist

Perhaps you should ask Peter Foldes (who first posted the URL) what
might happen if someone were to visit that site. I've not been there ,
so have no idea if it is a trap or not. There are lots of clever people
on the Microsoft newsgroups, some with Virtual Machines. Someone may
have been/be able to take a look to see if the site is/was infected in
some way.

Dave
 
That was earlier when I was attempting to fix my signature, as I just reformatted this computer to Windows Vista last night. Although, if you're here to critique signatures; you've done your job.

--

Colton, PHP/VB6/HTML/CSS/Javscript/IIS/Apache

OS: Vista Home Premium x86 SP1

- http://explosion.debug-inc.com
- (e-mail address removed)


Yes, why are we posting whois information for this IP address?

--
/¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
\\
\\ Colton
\\ http://explosion.debug-inc.com
// (e-mail address removed)
//
\\ PHP/VB6/HTML/CSS/Javascript/IIS/Apache
\\ Vista Home Premium User
//
// Anytime support, via email. (Do not spam.)
//
\_______________________________________________________________________
Click to expand...

Why do you have such an obnoxious sig?

I mean, IT IS REALLY OBNOXIOUS!!!
 
The same reason you get off on being a jerk in so many newsgroups with your
acid-tongued replies.

: Cody Jarrett wrote:
: > On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 06:37:44 -0500, "Colton" <[email protected]>
: > wrote:
: >
: >> That was earlier when I was attempting to fix my signature, as I just
reformatted this computer to Windows Vista last night. Although, if you're
here to critique signatures; you've done your job.
: >>
: >> --
: >>
: >> Colton, PHP/VB6/HTML/CSS/Javscript/IIS/Apache
: >>
: >> OS: Vista Home Premium x86 SP1
: >>
: >> - http://explosion.debug-inc.com
: >> - (e-mail address removed)
: >
: > Now you could remove the unnecessary spaces between the lines.
:
: Just curious, what difference does it make? Do get off being a net cop
: or what?
:
: Alias
 
Tom said:
The same reason you get off on being a jerk in so many newsgroups with your
acid-tongued replies.
Click to expand...

Care to cite one or do we have to live with vague generalizations?

BTW, "jerk" and "acid-tongued" are opinions (yours) and not facts.

Alias
 
Dave,

Thanks for the information. As soon as I get my virtual box up on this
computer again, I'll see if I can't find out why we're looking at this as a
newsgroup topic.

--

Colton, PHP/VB6/HTML/CSS/Javscript/IIS/Apache
OS: Vista Home Premium x86 SP1

- http://explosion.debug-inc.com
- (e-mail address removed)
 
It's good of you to take the time and trouble to look, Colton.

I'll be most interested to learn what, if anything, you find.

Good luck!

Dave

--
 
Andrew said:
Same difference as doing 90 mph in a 50 mph zone, or scrawling graffiti in
the local shopping centre. Someone made a law against it and we should stick
to it. Without laws we become a lawless society.
Click to expand...

There's no law on how to craft a signature. Got any more lame analogies?

Laws, btw, usually get changed because people break them. The more
people that break a law, the better the chances are that the law will be
repealed. An example was the 18th Amendment to the US Constitution.

Alias
 
Andrew said:
That was earlier when I was attempting to fix my signature, as I just reformatted this computer to Windows Vista last night. Although, if you're here to critique signatures; you've done your job.

--

Colton, PHP/VB6/HTML/CSS/Javscript/IIS/Apache

OS: Vista Home Premium x86 SP1

- http://explosion.debug-inc.com
- (e-mail address removed)


A Usenet sig should be no more than 5 lines... your is 7.
Click to expand...

Who says? And, pray tell, how will they enforce it?

Alias
 
Alias said:
Who says? And, pray tell, how will they enforce it?

Alias
Click to expand...


If you make posts like that, Alias, the regulars here will think YOU are
really ME ........ and that I've changed my name/address again! hahaha
;)

You and I know the truth - but no-one else can possibly know for sure,
can they?

Andrew, btw, is one of the good guys IMO (but I could just be wrong!)

Dave
 
~BD~ said:
If you make posts like that, Alias, the regulars here will think YOU are
really ME ........ and that I've changed my name/address again! hahaha
;)

You and I know the truth - but no-one else can possibly know for sure,
can they?

Andrew, btw, is one of the good guys IMO (but I could just be wrong!)

Dave
Click to expand...

I have little use for self appointed Usenet cops.

Alias
 
Alias said:
I have little use for self appointed Usenet cops.

Alias
Click to expand...


Ooops! Regardless, you helped me before, Alias - I don't forget! Thanks.

Any chance you could take a look here
'microsoft.public.security.homeusers' at my thread entitled 'Tracing an
IP address' - Perhaps I should tell you that the IP addresses are *not*
chosen randomly.

Dave
 
~BD~ said:
Ooops! Regardless, you helped me before, Alias - I don't forget! Thanks.

Any chance you could take a look here
'microsoft.public.security.homeusers' at my thread entitled 'Tracing an
IP address' - Perhaps I should tell you that the IP addresses are *not*
chosen randomly.

Dave
Click to expand...

I went there but it wasn't very interesting so I unsubscribed. As I use
Linux for most things, security isn't really a concern.

Alias
 
Alias said:
I went there but it wasn't very interesting so I unsubscribed. As I
use Linux for most things, security isn't really a concern.

Alias
Click to expand...


I really appreciate that, Alias - even though you found nothing of
interest. Thank you.

Maybe PABear will explain to someone like you why he thinks I'm special.
He has often said "Please don't feed the trolls...especially /that/
troll".

Have you ever visited Aumha (Robear's home territory) and challenged
anyone to a duel over technical matters? You might find *that*
interesting!!

Dave
 
~BD~ said:
I really appreciate that, Alias - even though you found nothing of
interest. Thank you.
Click to expand...

It might be a good information source if I have to deal with a
compromised Windows machine.
Maybe PABear will explain to someone like you why he thinks I'm special.
He has often said "Please don't feed the trolls...especially /that/
troll".
Click to expand...

I stopped worrying about what people said about me on Usenet way before
the turn of the century.
Have you ever visited Aumha (Robear's home territory) and challenged
anyone to a duel over technical matters? You might find *that*
interesting!!

Dave
Click to expand...

I assume it's moderated. The only forums I visit are on Usenet and not
all that many. I used to do it more and on web based forums but I just
ain't got that much time or inclination anymore.

That said, PABear can come up with some useful copy and pastes every
once and awhile and is well informed regarding Windows Updates.

Alias
 
Andrew Taylor said:
But there is, you just don't know it or acknowledge it. The rules for Usenet
are under the 'rules' of RFCs.
Click to expand...

Nobody - N O B O D Y - pays attention to those any more. They went out
when people stopped using Lynx.
 
Back
Top