R
Ruel Smith
BP said:I just had an ASUS P4C800E-Deluxe board go bad. It seems this is not an
unusual event: http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/8069/?o=40
I have real reservations about using this board again. I'm thinking I
should go with a board that, while it may not have as many features, is
much more reliable and well built. Does anyone have any info or links to
information on motherboard reliability ratings. Most ratings I've found
address features and price only. What brands do you have confidence in?
Honestly, as long as you use a top tier board maker like Gigabyte, MSI,
Abit, etc, I don't think there's much difference in the component quality.
Each brand has certain boards that are stellar and some that are
problematic. Sometimes, you'll even have great luck with problematic
boards. I own a Gigabyte GA-8IRXP board that users had lots of reboot
problems with when overclocking. It's been a great board for me, and it's
overclocked to 3.0 GHz (from 2.6 GHz).
Don't believe in those comparisons, either. Tom's hardware had a love affair
with Gigabyte for awhile, then MSI. Also, the manufacturers give hand
selected samples to them, and even fudge things in the BIOS to get them to
run better. It used to be that boards would show up a couple of MHz hotter
on the FSB, but reviewers started getting smarter about that. Then, MSI
snuck in dynamic overclocking on them. It's all a game, just like the
nVidia vs. ATi war. They all cheat...some more than others.