N
nb
What kind of problems is c# best at solving?
nb said:What kind of problems is c# best at solving?
I agree, the functionality is basically the same. In my opinion it dependsIt's functionally 99.99% identical to VB
At least VB.NET has background compilation (in my opinion a very productiveDIM A AS INTEGER ';
John Sparrow said:Anything you could do in VB, but with more elegance and half the typing....
grin
More seriously (hey, I was basically serious above!) don't believe those who
tell you "C# is only for virtual device drivers and low level programming"
etc etc. I have had a number of debates with VB programmers about this
(maybe they got sucked into VB.NET because they *thought* that was the case,
and C# was only for serious code-heads, but it doesn't make it true).
It's functionally 99.99% identical to VB. Just has a different (and in my
opinion, superior) syntax.
The MSDN team seem to hate VB.. eg their gag about semicolons:
"You can still use semicolons in VB, you just have to use the special
'semicolon prefix symbol'.."
DIM A AS INTEGER ';
Well it made me laugh....
John
Please, for all our sakes(not to mention your own), please write properFlare said:Willam for all (and your own sake) plz cut irrelevant text out of your
answer and answer below what your are answering about (or asking), or at
least cut out irrelevant text blocks if you think answerering should be
above.
English, with words spelled and capitalized properly.
Plz isn't a word, complaining about someones quoting while using such a
phrase irks me.
Jan Tielens said:Please do not make this discussion religious!
I agree, the functionality is basically the same. In my opinion it depends
on your background: if you are/were a VB6 developer, go ahead: try VB.NET.
If you know C++ or Java (grin), check out C#. At a certain point you'll look
to "the other side", so the result will be you'll know both languages!
At least VB.NET has background compilation (in my opinion a very productive
feature) and it's will have edit-and-continue in Whidbey!
--
Greetz,
Jan
__________________________________
Read my weblog: http://weblogs.asp.net/jan
"John Sparrow" <[email protected]> schreef in bericht
Eric Newton said:I'd like to know why VB renamed some of the IL keywords:
sealed (C#) = NotInheritable (VB)
abstract (C#) = MustInherit (VB)
why, vb? why?
--
Eric Newton
C#/ASP Application Developer
http://ensoft-software.com/
(e-mail address removed)-software.com [remove the first "CC."]
John Sparrow said:Anything you could do in VB, but with more elegance and half the typing....
grin
More seriously (hey, I was basically serious above!) don't believe those who
tell you "C# is only for virtual device drivers and low level programming"
etc etc. I have had a number of debates with VB programmers about this
(maybe they got sucked into VB.NET because they *thought* that was the case,
and C# was only for serious code-heads, but it doesn't make it true).
It's functionally 99.99% identical to VB. Just has a different (and in my
opinion, superior) syntax.
The MSDN team seem to hate VB.. eg their gag about semicolons:
"You can still use semicolons in VB, you just have to use the special
'semicolon prefix symbol'.."
DIM A AS INTEGER ';
Well it made me laugh....
John
Point is, if you are going to complain about someone elses posting, oneFlare said:I belive that is not quite the same. I had no chance helping him because I
did not know what he answere was refering to. Your comment is just trying to
flame me. I was just trying to guide him so that I could help him.I belive I
said it in a freindly tone.
And I apoligize for my bad english then.....jeeee
John Sparrow said:Dumbing down? Just wait till VB.NET 2, when:
'Integer' becomes 'AnyWholeNumberYouLike'
and
'Double' becomes
'AbsolutelyAnyNumberYouLikeButSlowerThanAnyWholeNumberYouLike'
Eric Newton said:I'd like to know why VB renamed some of the IL keywords:
sealed (C#) = NotInheritable (VB)
abstract (C#) = MustInherit (VB)
why, vb? why?
--
Eric Newton
C#/ASP Application Developer
http://ensoft-software.com/
(e-mail address removed)-software.com [remove the first "CC."]
thoseWhat kind of problems is c# best at solving?
Anything you could do in VB, but with more elegance and half the typing....
grin
More seriously (hey, I was basically serious above!) don't believe
whotell you "C# is only for virtual device drivers and low level programming"
etc etc. I have had a number of debates with VB programmers about this
(maybe they got sucked into VB.NET because they *thought* that was the case,
and C# was only for serious code-heads, but it doesn't make it true).
It's functionally 99.99% identical to VB. Just has a different (and in my
opinion, superior) syntax.
The MSDN team seem to hate VB.. eg their gag about semicolons:
"You can still use semicolons in VB, you just have to use the special
'semicolon prefix symbol'.."
DIM A AS INTEGER ';
Well it made me laugh....
John
Wow, at last we might get default variable types back from FORTRAN... SavedJan Tielens said:That's a good one, I have to remeber it!
In C# 2.0 Integer would become something like "i'? AND mind the casing! ;-)
John Sparrow said:Dumbing down? Just wait till VB.NET 2, when:
'Integer' becomes 'AnyWholeNumberYouLike'
and
'Double' becomes
'AbsolutelyAnyNumberYouLikeButSlowerThanAnyWholeNumberYouLike'
Eric Newton said:I'd like to know why VB renamed some of the IL keywords:
sealed (C#) = NotInheritable (VB)
abstract (C#) = MustInherit (VB)
why, vb? why?
--
Eric Newton
C#/ASP Application Developer
http://ensoft-software.com/
(e-mail address removed)-software.com [remove the first "CC."]
thoseWhat kind of problems is c# best at solving?
Anything you could do in VB, but with more elegance and half the typing....
grin
More seriously (hey, I was basically serious above!) don't believe
whotell you "C# is only for virtual device drivers and low level programming"
etc etc. I have had a number of debates with VB programmers about this
(maybe they got sucked into VB.NET because they *thought* that was the case,
and C# was only for serious code-heads, but it doesn't make it true).
It's functionally 99.99% identical to VB. Just has a different (and in my
opinion, superior) syntax.
The MSDN team seem to hate VB.. eg their gag about semicolons:
"You can still use semicolons in VB, you just have to use the special
'semicolon prefix symbol'.."
DIM A AS INTEGER ';
Well it made me laugh....
John