M
Mike
I have two tables with a like field in each table. Tables "A" and "B"
have a like field (Field#2). But Table "A" also has a field(Field#1)
which can contain a like value that is in Field#2.
I am trying to summarize Table "A" where Field#2 in Table "B" never
occurs in Field#1 in Table "A".
In the past I normally use the same method as the UnMatch Query Wizard
where I establish a left join between TableA(Field#1) and
TableB(Field#2) using a Where condition for TableB(Field#2) (Is Null).
I was trying to check the results by testing one record. So I queried
Table "A" for value "123ABC" by using the condition <> "123ABC" for
Field#1 and ="123ABC" for Table "A" Field#2.
The results are that by using the "Left-Join" method, I have a answer
set with fewer results than I do with my test query that doesn't use
the join. Why am I getting different answers?
I would appreciate any suggestions. Thanks.
have a like field (Field#2). But Table "A" also has a field(Field#1)
which can contain a like value that is in Field#2.
I am trying to summarize Table "A" where Field#2 in Table "B" never
occurs in Field#1 in Table "A".
In the past I normally use the same method as the UnMatch Query Wizard
where I establish a left join between TableA(Field#1) and
TableB(Field#2) using a Where condition for TableB(Field#2) (Is Null).
I was trying to check the results by testing one record. So I queried
Table "A" for value "123ABC" by using the condition <> "123ABC" for
Field#1 and ="123ABC" for Table "A" Field#2.
The results are that by using the "Left-Join" method, I have a answer
set with fewer results than I do with my test query that doesn't use
the join. Why am I getting different answers?
I would appreciate any suggestions. Thanks.