Treatment of Junk Email (Blocked addresses vs. suspected junk)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
G

Guest

You should have the option of being able to treat suspected junk email
differently than blocked email. Blocked email addresses should be discarded
directly rather than lumped in with all the other suspected junk email. This
makes review of the suspected email easier and shorter.

----------------
This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the
suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I
Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this
link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then
click "I Agree" in the message pane.

http://www.microsoft.com/office/com...42423aae0&dg=microsoft.public.outlook.general
 
under actions.... junk e-mail, I have added the sender to the safe sender
list. What more do i have to do?
 
BearUK45 said:
under actions.... junk e-mail, I have added the sender to the safe
sender list. What more do i have to do?
Click to expand...

What more do you have to do for what?
 
Greg said:
You should have the option of being able to treat suspected junk email
differently than blocked email. Blocked email addresses should be
discarded directly rather than lumped in with all the other suspected
junk email. This makes review of the suspected email easier and
shorter.
Click to expand...

So, use a rule.
 
There is no way that I know of setting up a rule that refers to your list of
blocked addresses.
 
Greg said:
There is no way that I know of setting up a rule that refers to your
list of blocked addresses.
Click to expand...

I didn't intend to imply that there was. Don't use the blocked senders list
(it's virutally pointless in blocking SPAM anyway, since SPAMmers keep
changing the sender). Instead, us a rule whose condition matches something
the junk messages share, like IP subnet or domain name.
 
Back
Top