Eustace said:
On 2006.06.28 21:33 Ken Blake, MVP wrote:
I am trying to understand the differences between the 2.
Bert answered this and described the differences, and I don't really have
anything to add, except one point below.
Ghost
restores the computer to a previous condition, including programs and
files
installed, while System Restore restores the system settings to the
previous condition. That means that before System Restore you have to
uninstall the application you installed; (I am not sure if you can do
it after restoring...). Regarding files, I don't mind backing up on a
CD, so there is not much advantage on this point for me. But I do think
that the 10 GB that Ghost demands (out of the 40 of my machine is a
bit too much.
What 10GB is that? Are you using Ghost to back up to a second partition on
your drive? Is so, I don't recommend backup to a second partition because
it leaves you susceptible to simultaneous loss of the original and backup to
many of the most common dangers: head crashes, severe power glitches, nearby
lightning strikes, virus attacks, even theft of the computer.
In my view, secure backup needs to be on removable media, and not kept in
the computer. For really secure backup (needed, for example, if the life of
your business depends on your data) you should have multiple generations of
backup, and at least one of those generations should be stored off-site.
My computer isn't used for business, but my personal backup scheme uses two
identical removable hard drives,I alternate between the two, and use Acronis
True Image to make a complete copy of the primary drive.