r said:
----------------------- 1 -----------------------
Providing a mirror for all these files is a public service (I pay for the bandwidth from my own pocket, and the site is add-free).
That’s what this post was about.
----------------------- 2 -----------------------
Benefits of NTFS:
http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system/winpreinst/ntfs-preinstall.mspx#XSLTsection124121120120
I am not disagreeing about the benefits of using NTFS, What I am
concerned about is the suggestion that existing FAT32 volumes should
be converted to NTFS with no additional warnings about the possible
pitfalls.
In particular there is a partition alignment issue. NTFS partitions,
in order to use the standard 4K cluster size, must begin on a 4K
boundary. FAT32 partitions almost always do not begin on a 4K
boundary. The result is that FAT32 partitions converted to NTFS end
up using a 512 byte cluster size which is highly inefficient and which
has a noticeable negative impact on overall performance.
Before converting a FAT32 partition to NTFS it is imperative that the
partition first be modified so as to put it onto a 4K boundary.
Utilities such as Partition Magic or BootItNG have the ability to do
this.
Disabling System Restore is a standard part of virus/spyware removal procedure. See example:
http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/[email protected]
Nothing on your page says anything about *temporarily* disabling
system restore. The technique is to disable system restore,
immediately reboot the computer, and immediately enable system
restore.
Your comment about "If you would like to be able to undo the described
changes, please use System Restore utility (see Windows Help and
Support (Start -> Help and Support)) to create a restore point first."
is a bit contradictory since disabling system restore results in the
deletion of all existing system restore points, including the one just
created per your suggestion.
Virtual Memory is a bit controversial, but I posted it as “Optional” with a loooooong list of prerequisites.
Virtual Memory is only controversial to those who do not really
understand it, especially with regard to how Windows copes with the
unused portions of memory allocation requests.
Using RAM for these items, which can easily aggregate to several
hundred megabytes on a heavily used computer (278mb on my machine at
this moment), is just plain foolish.
Did you miss some days @ your “Microsoft MVP” school (?)
Nope.
Ron Martell Duncan B.C. Canada
--
Microsoft MVP
On-Line Help Computer Service
http://onlinehelp.bc.ca
"The reason computer chips are so small is computers don't eat much."