"Search" option missing

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
G

Guest

Windows XP SP2

When right clicking on a folder in Windows Explorer (or My Computer etc on
desktop), the Search option is missing. It is also missing from the toolbar.
This problem is only user specific as it only affects one user when logging
onto a specific PC.

Any ideas how to get this back?

Many thanks
 
NoFind:
http://www.microsoft.com/resources/...s/2000/server/reskit/en-us/regentry/58873.asp

--
Regards,

Ramesh Srinivasan, Microsoft MVP [Windows XP Shell/User]
Windows® XP Troubleshooting http://www.winhelponline.com


Windows XP SP2

When right clicking on a folder in Windows Explorer (or My Computer etc on
desktop), the Search option is missing. It is also missing from the toolbar.
This problem is only user specific as it only affects one user when logging
onto a specific PC.

Any ideas how to get this back?

Many thanks
 
Many, if not most, Windows 2000 articles apply to Windows XP.

Windows 2000 (Professional and Server) are NT 5.0, Windows XP is NT 5.1 and
Windows Server 2003 is NT 5.2. Obviously there have been changes, but not
everything. ;-)

Windows 2003, Windows XP, and Windows 2000 Group Policies are all pretty
much the same, with some exceptions.

See both of these.

Remove Search menu from Start Menu
http://www.boyce.us/gp/gpcontent.asp?ID=344

NoFind:
http://www.microsoft.com/resources/...s/2000/server/reskit/en-us/regentry/58873.asp

--
Hope this helps. Let us know.

Wes
MS-MVP Windows Shell/User

In
 
Today Wesley Vogel commented courteously on the subject at
hand
Many, if not most, Windows 2000 articles apply to Windows
XP.

Windows 2000 (Professional and Server) are NT 5.0, Windows
XP is NT 5.1 and Windows Server 2003 is NT 5.2. Obviously
there have been changes, but not everything. ;-)

Windows 2003, Windows XP, and Windows 2000 Group Policies
are all pretty much the same, with some exceptions.

See both of these.

Remove Search menu from Start Menu
http://www.boyce.us/gp/gpcontent.asp?ID=344

OK. I thought it was the other way around, that 2000 came
first. I gather that these are derivative works of NT.

But, how would somebody who's only moderately knowledgeable on
this stuff, like me, know whether any particular KB article
that talks about 2000 or NT only, would also apply to XP? And,
within XP, there's Home and Pro (which I have), base, SP1, and
SP2. Wouldn't there be risks in blindly following something
that says "only applies to Win 2000"?

I get most of my fixes from Kelly's Korner, whom I trust
because she tests this stuff extensively. On the other hand, I
distrust M$, and do a "CRC" to ensure accuracy of
"transmission" before following anything that can't easily be
undone, such as a Registry hack.
 
Hi Jerry,
OK. I thought it was the other way around, that 2000 came
first. I gather that these are derivative works of NT.

The NT family:

Windows NT 3.1
Windows NT 3.5
Windows NT 3.51
Windows NT 4.0
Windows 2000 (Professional and Server) - NT 5.0
Windows XP - NT 5.1
Windows Server 2003 - NT 5.2

NT stands for New Technology.
XP stands for eXPerience.

Try this.

Open a command prompt...
Start | Run | Type: cmd | Click OK |
Type set in the prompt and hit your Enter key |
Look for OS

It looks like this...
OS=Windows_NT

Start | Run | Type: winver | Click OK |
Notice where it says: Version 5.1
But, how would somebody who's only moderately knowledgeable on
this stuff, like me, know whether any particular KB article
that talks about 2000 or NT only, would also apply to XP?

eXPerience is all I can say. Or ask if someone posts a link to a 2000 or NT
article if it applies to XP.

Heck, there are MSKB articles that are for MS-DOS, Windows 3.1x, 95, 98 and
ME that apply to XP and do not say so in the article. eXPerience. <shrug>

--
Hope this helps. Let us know.

Wes
MS-MVP Windows Shell/User

In
 
Today Wesley Vogel commented courteously on the subject at
hand
Hi Jerry,


The NT family:

Windows NT 3.1
Windows NT 3.5
Windows NT 3.51
Windows NT 4.0
Windows 2000 (Professional and Server) - NT 5.0
Windows XP - NT 5.1
Windows Server 2003 - NT 5.2

Thank you.
NT stands for New Technology.
XP stands for eXPerience.

I'd heard these before, although I'm more dubious about XP.
And, there was the soon forgotten ME - Millenium Edition.
Try this.

Open a command prompt...
Start | Run | Type: cmd | Click OK |
Type set in the prompt and hit your Enter key |
Look for OS

It looks like this...
OS=Windows_NT

Start | Run | Type: winver | Click OK |
Notice where it says: Version 5.1

Hmmm. Yes, it does. I often run cmd but haven't used set in
years. Thanks again.
eXPerience is all I can say. Or ask if someone posts a
link to a 2000 or NT article if it applies to XP.

Yes, OK. But on this NG as well as the many XP groups, people
replying often mis-read or misunderstand the OP's request and
post erroneous suggestions, including the MVPs who oft promote
KB fixes. Hence, I am quite reluctant to do anything that
doesn't at least say XP, since I am not "eXPerienced" enough
to know what is or is not applicable to my version of "NT."

Or, are you saying that /any/ NT and /any/ 2000 KB article is
applicable to XP Pro SP1 and SP2?
Heck, there are MSKB articles that are for MS-DOS, Windows
3.1x, 95, 98 and ME that apply to XP and do not say so in
the article. eXPerience. <shrug>

True, very true. But, them that has even a smidgeon of
eXPerience know better than to apply a DOS, 3.x, 95, 98, ME
fix blindly, right? <grin>
 
Yes, OK. But on this NG as well as the many XP groups, people
replying often mis-read or misunderstand the OP's request and
post erroneous suggestions, including the MVPs who oft promote
KB fixes.

I have absolutely no idea how anyone is gonna solve that problem. I can't
speak for anyone else, but I misread stuff all the time, even when it is
well written. Let alone when someone posts as if English is a second or
third language for them.

You could follow Andrew E's or philip maurice nelson's advice, they aren't
MVPs. *eg*
Or, are you saying that /any/ NT and /any/ 2000 KB article is
applicable to XP Pro SP1 and SP2?

Of course not. There are plenty of differences just between XP SP1 and SP2.
And even between XP Home and Pro. The problem is that a lot of folks don't
say which version they have when they post a question. Then they wonder why
Windows cannot find gpedit.msc when they try to run it.
True, very true. But, them that has even a smidgeon of
eXPerience know better than to apply a DOS, 3.x, 95, 98, ME
fix blindly, right? <grin>

If I told you to put a bag of microwave popcorn in the microwave oven on
high, for 30 minutes, you might be a bit suspicious. ;-) Or if I told you
to replace the throwout bearing on your Mopar that has an automatic
transmission, your experience would probably tell you that I didn't know
what I was talking about.

The more someone knows about anything, the better they can help themselves.
Experience counts in everything. An expert is nothing more than someone who
has made most of the mistakes and knows how to fix them.

Your original question was...
I was interested in the OP's problem, so please tell me how a
Win2K KB article helps people with an XP Pro SP2 issue.

That particular Windows 2000 article applies to Windows 2000, XP and 2003.

There is little or no Microsoft online documentation of XP Group Policy and
related registry settings. There is pretty good Microsoft Windows 2000 and
2003 GP documentation.

Windows 2000 Group Policy Reference
http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/Windows/2000/server/reskit/en-us/w2rkbook/gp.asp

Windows 2000 Registry Reference
http://www.microsoft.com/resources/...000/server/reskit/en-us/w2rkbook/regentry.asp

Windows 2000 Group Policy Registry Table
http://www.microsoft.com/resources/...s/2000/server/reskit/en-us/regentry/GPRef.asp

Windows 2000 Policies
http://www.microsoft.com/resources/...s/2000/server/reskit/en-us/regentry/93213.asp

Windows Server 2003 Resource Kit Registry Reference
http://www.microsoft.com/resources/...3/all/deployguide/en-us/regentry_overview.asp

Jim Boyce has 844 policies in his database.

Jim Boyce - Windows Tips Group Policy
http://www.boyce.us/gp/gplistall.asp

--
Hope this helps. Let us know.

Wes
MS-MVP Windows Shell/User

In
 
Today Wesley Vogel commented courteously on the subject at
hand
I have absolutely no idea how anyone is gonna solve that
problem. I can't speak for anyone else, but I misread
stuff all the time, even when it is well written. Let
alone when someone posts as if English is a second or third
language for them.

You could follow Andrew E's or philip maurice nelson's
advice, they aren't MVPs. *eg*

I will. I far more value the advice and counsel of real users,
and not company shills, whether paid or "volunteer" because
try as they might, they'll always have a hidden agenda. Having
said that, there's time where there just ain't no substitute
for talking to someone who has a pipe into M$. I just wish the
MVPs would at least start with the notion that an OP isn't
stupid, just ignorant of what to do. Then, I'd like to see the
MVPs move on to non-biased advice, particularly germanaine to
the OP's question/problem.

I know that's asking a lot, but hope springs eternal from the
human breast.
Of course not. There are plenty of differences just
between XP SP1 and SP2. And even between XP Home and Pro.
The problem is that a lot of folks don't say which version
they have when they post a question. Then they wonder why
Windows cannot find gpedit.msc when they try to run it.

Part of the problem for any OP, not just me, is that they
don't always know what is important to include and what is
fluff. And, repliers - all of them - often get pissed off if
an OP has vomit of the keyboard, so it is difficult to gauge
how much to say and when.

But, if /all/ of us park our collective egos and company
allegiences at the door and treat each other with respect,
clarifying questions could be asked and answered without
anyone getting flamed.
If I told you to put a bag of microwave popcorn in the
microwave oven on high, for 30 minutes, you might be a bit
suspicious. ;-) Or if I told you to replace the throwout
bearing on your Mopar that has an automatic transmission,
your experience would probably tell you that I didn't know
what I was talking about.

The more someone knows about anything, the better they can
help themselves. Experience counts in everything. An
expert is nothing more than someone who has made most of
the mistakes and knows how to fix them.

When people say a person is "bright" or a "dimwit", what they
really refer to crudely is not just how much inate
intelligence the other guy has, but how much
knowledge/ignorance they have, how much inexperience/vast
experience they have, and none/excellent judgment based on
learning from past mistakes.

What you describe above is actually a judgment issue, not just
experience per se. I could "experience" blowing up microwave
popcorn bags every day of my life and never learn that it is
really dumb to do that. Hence, error without learning and
correction and thus no development of judgment.

Also, each of us is gifted or deprived, as the case may be,
with a very logical mind or a scatter-brain mind. 99 44/100%
of OP threads I see are something totally vanilla like "i
tried to start my computer this moring and windows says it
can't find xxx, what do i do?"

My first reaction is to fix your shift key, my next reaction,
which others have as well is "what the hell did you do just
prior to that?" But, if flames start because of an OP's
ineptness or just - inEXerience - it's all over but the
crying.
Your original question was...

That particular Windows 2000 article applies to Windows
2000, XP and 2003.

I asked because when I looked, I didn't see XP listed. If it's
there, I missed it, I only saw Win2K.
There is little or no Microsoft online documentation of XP
Group Policy and related registry settings. There is
pretty good Microsoft Windows 2000 and 2003 GP
documentation.

I didn'nt know that, which explains why I so miserably failed
trying to figure out why my new PC and my old one didn't talk
over my network.
Windows 2000 Group Policy Reference
http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/Windows/200
0/server/reskit/en-us/w2rkbook/gp.asp

Windows 2000 Registry Reference
http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/Windows/200
0/server/reskit/en-us/w2rkbook/regentry.asp

Windows 2000 Group Policy Registry Table
http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/Windows/200
0/server/reskit/en-us/Default.asp?url=/resources/documentati
on/Windows/2000/server/reskit/en-us/regentry/GPRef.asp

Windows 2000 Policies
http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/Windows/200
0/server/reskit/en-us/Default.asp?url=/resources/documentati
on/Windows/2000/server/reskit/en-us/regentry/93213.asp

Windows Server 2003 Resource Kit Registry Reference
http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/WindowsServ
/2003/all/deployguide/en-us/regentry_overview.asp
Jim Boyce has 844 policies in his database.

Jim Boyce - Windows Tips Group Policy
http://www.boyce.us/gp/gplistall.asp

Thanks for all the links. I'll go there and bookmark them.
And, thanks for gently putting me in my smart-ass place
(that's me talking, I'm not lecturing you). Last year, I
bought Jerry Honeycutt's excellent "windows Registry Guide".
It's been a valuable resource.

In the early-to-mid stages of my SP2 UDF disc crashes, I
looked through dozens of very technical books in stores but
failed to get even a hint as to what the problem was because
basically I didn't know enough about the problem to look in
the right part of the indices!
 
Back
Top