G
Guest
HI everyone,
I am facing a problem with ms access 2000. I have an unbound form name
"Employees" with a listbox showing 5 columns of information:
EmployeeID, FirstName, Last Name, Date of birth, Country of origin. The
listbox is based on the table "tblEmployees". On that form there is also a
button labeled "Entry" which opens up a form name "Employees data entry". The
form "Employees data entry" is unbound also. The data entered in the text
boxes are inserted in the table tblEmployees via a routine name
"InsertEmployees". The last instruction in this routine is:
Forms!Employees!EmployeeList.Requery, which is supposed to refresh the list
box on the form "Employees" to show the new inserted employee. But nothing
like that happened. To show the new inserted employee, I have to close the
form "Employees" and open it again which insane. I need to know if the
problem is with ms access 2000 (which I suspect). It just doesn't make sense
for microsoft to fool around with a developer's mind like that. Is microsoft
access 2000 a reliable product or not? Please HELP! DOES ANYONE KNOW SOMEBODY
AT MICROSOFT I CAN BRING UP THIS ISSUE TO. BECAUSE MY CUSTOMER CAN'T WAIT ANY
LONGER.
I am facing a problem with ms access 2000. I have an unbound form name
"Employees" with a listbox showing 5 columns of information:
EmployeeID, FirstName, Last Name, Date of birth, Country of origin. The
listbox is based on the table "tblEmployees". On that form there is also a
button labeled "Entry" which opens up a form name "Employees data entry". The
form "Employees data entry" is unbound also. The data entered in the text
boxes are inserted in the table tblEmployees via a routine name
"InsertEmployees". The last instruction in this routine is:
Forms!Employees!EmployeeList.Requery, which is supposed to refresh the list
box on the form "Employees" to show the new inserted employee. But nothing
like that happened. To show the new inserted employee, I have to close the
form "Employees" and open it again which insane. I need to know if the
problem is with ms access 2000 (which I suspect). It just doesn't make sense
for microsoft to fool around with a developer's mind like that. Is microsoft
access 2000 a reliable product or not? Please HELP! DOES ANYONE KNOW SOMEBODY
AT MICROSOFT I CAN BRING UP THIS ISSUE TO. BECAUSE MY CUSTOMER CAN'T WAIT ANY
LONGER.