So what you saying is that I need to
get off my butt finish the DB that
i've been building for my specific
line of work and then sell it?
No. Many MVPs were selected because they gave a lot of good answers in
newsgroups -- for a long while, that was the only way they measured
"contributions to the Microsoft software user community"; in recent years,
however, they take other things into consideration: authorship of books and
articles, involvement in local and national user groups, etc.
One of my colleagues was recently awarded, who rarely ever visits
newsgroups, but who has a long history of serving as an officer in multiple
user groups, and who is one of the best teachers of software development
topics I have ever known.
In my case, I was a prolific poster to the USENET newsgroup
comp.databases.ms-access, but wasn't awarded until I began posting more
frequently in the microsoft.public... newsgroups. Others told me that my two
websites, one containing examples and the other links to resources and user
group information, and my long-time involvement in two Access user groups
were also discussed.
Only the Microsoft employees who run their MVP program know the exact
requirements and only they select who is awarded, and they don't discuss the
procedure or specifics. At the appropriate time, they announce who has been
awarded, in private MVP newsgroups.
It is an annual award for what one has done in the previous year -- there is
no guarantee that anyone will be re-awarded for the next year. Many are,
simply because they keep on contributing to the user community.
Larry Linson
Microsoft Access MVP