ProSavage DDR 's 1.1 opengl

  • Thread starter Thread starter =?GB2312?B?Rmx5aW5nIEZveCBvZiB0aGUgU25vd3kgTW91bnR
  • Start date Start date
?

=?GB2312?B?Rmx5aW5nIEZveCBvZiB0aGUgU25vd3kgTW91bnR

Hi,

am using ProSavage DDR integrated card with VIA chipset on a MSI V
motherboard. Discovered it only has 1.1 opengl. went on to download
the latest driver from s3 website. installed it. and then it turns out
it is only 1.1 opengl also.

Any advise on getting 1.4 opengl? thanks
 
Flying said:
Hi,

am using ProSavage DDR integrated card with VIA chipset on a MSI V
motherboard. Discovered it only has 1.1 opengl. went on to download
the latest driver from s3 website. installed it. and then it turns out
it is only 1.1 opengl also.

Any advise on getting 1.4 opengl? thanks
Click to expand...

You might do better to try comp.graphics.api.opengl.
 
Flying Fox of the Snowy Mountain ѩɽ·Éºü said:
Hi,

am using ProSavage DDR integrated card with VIA chipset on a MSI V
motherboard. Discovered it only has 1.1 opengl. went on to download
the latest driver from s3 website. installed it. and then it turns out
it is only 1.1 opengl also.

Any advise on getting 1.4 opengl? thanks
Click to expand...

I wouldnt bother. That card sucks, i should know, i was stupid enough to buy
a laptop with one in. OpenGL performance is appaling, DirectX is only
marginally better.

hamman
 
You might do better to try comp.graphics.api.opengl.
Click to expand...

No it wouldn't.

comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video would be a better choice.

The request was for a runtime driver. As you might note in the name
of the group, comp.graphics.api.opengl is aimed at programming and
development issues with the openGL API.
 
I wouldnt bother. That card sucks, i should know, i was stupid enough to buy
a laptop with one in. OpenGL performance is appaling, DirectX is only
marginally better.

hamman
Click to expand...

It's not THAT bad, just not appropriate for 3D gaming... still plenty fast
enough for most screensavers, DVDs, etc.
 
MCheu said:
No it wouldn't.

comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video would be a better choice.

The request was for a runtime driver. As you might note in the name
of the group, comp.graphics.api.opengl is aimed at programming and
development issues with the openGL API.
Click to expand...

Could you point to comp.graphics.api.opengl's charter?
 
Matt said:
Could you point to comp.graphics.api.opengl's charter?
Click to expand...

Nope. I'm not saying no, I won't. I'm saying no, I can't. I don't
even know if there is one.

I didn't say it was necessarily off topic there, but the majority of
the discussions are on how to program with OpenGL, differences in the
versions of the specification and discussions on the specs and
features themslves of the API versions -- and the occasional flame war
on D3D vs OpenGL. Hardware discussions are often ignored or are
referred. No official rules as far as I know. There's a faq, but it
mostly deals with programming issues that might come up about how to
use certain functions in OpenGL, nothing about what may or may not be
posted. That and the fact that the name of the group has API in it
kind of suggests that it's a programming group.

It just seemed counter productive to send the guy there because he's
not likely to find what he's looking for there.
 
Got the answer from comp.graphics.api.opengl

the card is too old for supporting opengl 1.4
 
I could still play Counter Strike: condition zero on it.

but the performance of the card under Need for speed 7 is bad compared
to my aging Geforce 2 MX
 
Buy a newer video card.
Built in S3/Via graphics don't even have a built-in T&L graphics engine.

First gen GeForce256 cards had hardware T&L , so don't expect much from
unichrome and the likes.

"Li Hong Zhang: Prime Minister of China during end of Qing era"
 
This is for my 9 year old nephew's pc.

And my sister does not have the budget. Will donate my GeForce2 MX to
him once I upgrade to new card.
 
Back
Top