ANONYMOUS said:
Most Windows programs I have dealt with cannot be installed by a
Limited
User in XP. Windows Programs can be run as a limited user without
installing e.g. CPUID, MAgicJelly etc but these don't need to be
installed anyway.
I didn't know that Intuit can be installed in Windows XP. If this is
the case then it is XP that is at fault NOT Intuit. XP should not
allow limited user to inatall any programs never mind changing dates
and changing security settings.
We are talking about Installing programs and nor running programs are
we?
No. We are talking about the OP's natural and security-wise desire to
keep his users (with accounts that properly do not have administrative
privileges so they cannot install software) being foiled because some
of the programs he needs those users to run will only run in an account
with administrative privileges.
Intuit is the company that makes Quicken and QuickBooks. QuickBooks, an
accounting program widely used by the Windows world, cannot be run in
an account with administrative privileges without going through quite a
few machinations (documented by MVP - and CPA - Susan Bradley on her
website - which you can Google). Intuit have just announced that they
will change their code to work with Vista's new "least privileged user"
setup.
Aside from QuickBooks, this situation is most often seen in businesses
where "niche" software (also called "industry-specific") software is
used. The computer owner must then make a decision whether to run his
workstations securely or to run the programs he needs. Sometimes the
situation occurs in home computer use with older programs that were
designed for DOS/Win9x/ME, operating systems that were not multi-user
OS's with permissions. Workarounds are as I have already stated twice.
Hope that clarified it for you.
Malke