K
Ken Beauchesne
Does anyone have any experience to which is a faster
solution , a 200mhz arm9 or a 400mhz xscale processor
Tia
Ken
solution , a 200mhz arm9 or a 400mhz xscale processor
Tia
Ken
C
Chris Tacke, eMVP
So you're wondering if a 200MHz ARM processor is faster than a 400MHz ARM
processor?
--
Chris Tacke
Co-founder
OpenNETCF.org
Has OpenNETCF helped you? Consider donating to support us!
http://www.opennetcf.org/donate
processor?
--
Chris Tacke
Co-founder
OpenNETCF.org
Has OpenNETCF helped you? Consider donating to support us!
http://www.opennetcf.org/donate
S
Steve Maillet \(eMVP\)
Depends on which XScale, and what you are doing. In some cases a 200 Mhz
ARM920T will outperform an XScale device. It all depends on what you are
doing.
ARM920T will outperform an XScale device. It all depends on what you are
doing.
A
Alex Feinman [MVP]
Well, it's more like wondering if P4 Mobile 3.06 will outperform Pentium-M
1.7. The answer is - you need to test to find out.
1.7. The answer is - you need to test to find out.
G
Guest
And what to test as Steve points out. Maybe the ARM9 has an FPU... 
-Chris
-Chris
K
Ken Beauchesne
its pretty much just little bits of everything, my ce image is about 12meg
now using
a sharp a404 which is an arm 9 and its slow just navigating "my device"
viewing
local folders. it seems when you add in "Wired Local Area Network" to the
bsp that is
the killer. I did the pain staking exercise of building images one feature
at a time
and when you get to items like Compact Flash , soap server and wired lan
they
suck up all the resource from the arm9. So with that does anyone think the
xscale
what ever version PXA27xx or other think I could get any better results.
Ken
now using
a sharp a404 which is an arm 9 and its slow just navigating "my device"
viewing
local folders. it seems when you add in "Wired Local Area Network" to the
bsp that is
the killer. I did the pain staking exercise of building images one feature
at a time
and when you get to items like Compact Flash , soap server and wired lan
they
suck up all the resource from the arm9. So with that does anyone think the
xscale
what ever version PXA27xx or other think I could get any better results.
Ken
P
Paul G. Tobey [eMVP]
It's not processor that those things are sucking up, especially if you
aren't actually connected to the network. They're using up RAM. Compact
Flash support does *nothing* unless there's a card installed and you're
browsing it or whatever. The same is true of wired network support; no
network connection, no processor cycles used.
Paul T.
aren't actually connected to the network. They're using up RAM. Compact
Flash support does *nothing* unless there's a card installed and you're
browsing it or whatever. The same is true of wired network support; no
network connection, no processor cycles used.
Paul T.