P4 800 SE OR Deluxe?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jayson
  • Start date Start date
J

jayson

What's the difference between these two boards? They both have RAID
and use the same chip set... any major advantage of the Deluxe over
the SE? Thanks...
 
What's the difference between these two boards? They both have RAID
and use the same chip set... any major advantage of the Deluxe over
the SE? Thanks...

One other question: Northwood or Prescott?
 
jayson said:
One other question: Northwood or Prescott?

P4P800-SE P4P800-E Deluxe
-----------------------+-------------------+--------------------------
ICH5R ICH5R (Same basic main chipset)
+ Promise PDC20378 (Another raid chip)
+ 2 Port Firewire (firewire chip)
AD1985 6-ch sound ALC850 8-ch sound (roughly the same. AD1985
is a bit "muddy" due to
too much reverb in driver.
8 ch sound usually
steals "Aux-in" header
signal for output of
channel 7 and 8, so might
as well be six channel.)
+ vocal POST errors (useful for debugging)
+ optical SPDIF out (both have coax SPDIF out,
deluxe adds optical SPDIF
output)
+ SATA power cable
+ 1 more 80 wire
IDE cable

The Promise chip might come in handy, if you use a lot of
disks. You may or may not like the Firewire chip - check
Google for any problems with that particular kind of Firewire
chip (Via VT6307) versus whatever camera you use with it.

Between Northwood and Prescott, Prescott runs a bit hotter, but
Prescott may overclock a bit further than the Northwood. Choose
Northwood if you plan to run at stock speed, while if you are
planning on pushing the processor into overclock territory,
the Prescott may pay off there. If you check www.cpudatabase.com
you'll notice the Prescott overclockers use water cooling, while
the Northwood overclockers use air. Whether this is representative
of the better availability of water cooling systems when Prescott
showed up, is hard to say.

(If I was planning on monster overclocks with an S478 processor,
I would choose a P4C800-E Deluxe or a competitors board with
the same 875P chipset. When the CPU clock goes from the normal
200Mhz, to above 250MHz, the 875P won't have video artifacts,
while the 865PE may see artifacts. Do a search on abxzone for
"artifacts" to find out more.)

Xbitlabs has noticed in their testing, that Prescott has a fix for
Hyperthreading, for a performance problem seen in Northwood. There
is a "replay loop" in both processors, and Prescott is a little
more resistant to a certain pathological condition. In normal
use, you may or may not notice any difference either way - some
people like to turn off Hyperthreading anyway, as it isn't always
an advantage.

http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/netburst-2_18.html

You may want to examine more of the articles on this page:
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/

When it comes to any processor selection, you really need to
consider your own application mix (office applications,
gaming, video editing, Photoshop, compression), as the
benchmarks will vary between platforms. Each processor has
different strengths and weaknesses, so the more benchmarks
you examine, the better you'll be prepared for your purchasing
choice.

If you are building a system used mainly for gaming, a high end
Athlon64 would be a better choice. For any other purposes, it is
up to you to read the benchmark articles on Tomshardware,
Anandtech, and the like. There are as many opinions on the
subject, as there are reviewers.

And availability may make a difference too. If you cannot find
Northwoods any more, the choice will be moot.

Paul
 
The P4P800-E Deluxe offers the most complete RAID solution. A Promise RAID
controller offers RAID 0, 1 and 0+1 functions with Max. 2 UltraATA 133 ports
and 2 SATA HD ports, enabling users to build a RAID array with any 2, 3 or 4
of the ports. With unique multi-RAID function, RAID 0 and RAID 1 array can
co-exist.

P4P800 SE
ICH5R with Integrated SATA and RAID 0
Intel is the world's first chipset maker to integrate Serial ATA (SATA) and
RAID 0, 1 functions into the South Bridge. The latest ICH5R chipset now
delivers 150MB/s fast data transfer (SATA) and striping performance to
enhance computing efficiency.

I am running an SE with a Prescott 3.2 no problems.
I do not use the RAID
 
The P4P800-E Deluxe offers the most complete RAID solution. A Promise RAID
controller offers RAID 0, 1 and 0+1 functions with Max. 2 UltraATA 133 ports
and 2 SATA HD ports, enabling users to build a RAID array with any 2, 3 or 4
of the ports. With unique multi-RAID function, RAID 0 and RAID 1 array can
co-exist.

P4P800 SE
ICH5R with Integrated SATA and RAID 0
Intel is the world's first chipset maker to integrate Serial ATA (SATA) and
RAID 0, 1 functions into the South Bridge. The latest ICH5R chipset now
delivers 150MB/s fast data transfer (SATA) and striping performance to
enhance computing efficiency.

I am running an SE with a Prescott 3.2 no problems.
I do not use the RAID

Thanks for the help; I'm leaning towards the SE board (since I've read
about some similar boot problems E Deluxe users are having) with a 2.8
Northwood processor and 4 gigs of memory. I'm still not exceptionally
clear about Northwood vs. Prescott cpu, although I did read the
Prescott runs hotter with no significant performance boost over the
Northwood, and with some apps, the Northwood is faster, although the
Prescott appears to be more future-proof.
 
the problem is finding a northwood cpu
I wanted one but had to settle for the prescott
it run fine. I got the retail with fan and heatsink
no problems with heat. I do run 5 fans in my box.
 
the problem is finding a northwood cpu
I wanted one but had to settle for the prescott
it run fine. I got the retail with fan and heatsink
no problems with heat. I do run 5 fans in my box.
Thanks again; I need to do more research on this purchase because I'm
moving some large Photoshop CS files around and my PIII 866 with 1.5
gigs of memory just isn't doing it anymore. I want to build a box
that will be significantly faster and more efficient than what I now
have. I don't want to put a new one together and find that the
upgrade is minor at best after an investment of about $800. It needs
to support scsi and a Matrox 650 graphics card and a few other things
like a Hollywood + dvd decoder card, etc. This isn't about gaming;
more about graphics and work. So compatibility and speed and
efficiency are big issues as they are with every motherboard/cpu
upgrade. I'm even contemplating AMD although I think this might pose
even larger problems than I'm willing to deal with. Unfortunately the
P4 Prescott "upgrade" doesn't seem like it's much of a performance
spike over the PIII; if I had more memory slots on my board, I would
wait for the next significant thing before upgrading...
 
jayson said:
Thanks again; I need to do more research on this purchase because I'm
moving some large Photoshop CS files around and my PIII 866 with 1.5
gigs of memory just isn't doing it anymore. I want to build a box
that will be significantly faster and more efficient than what I now
have. I don't want to put a new one together and find that the
upgrade is minor at best after an investment of about $800. It needs
to support scsi and a Matrox 650 graphics card and a few other things
like a Hollywood + dvd decoder card, etc. This isn't about gaming;
more about graphics and work. So compatibility and speed and
efficiency are big issues as they are with every motherboard/cpu
upgrade. I'm even contemplating AMD although I think this might pose
even larger problems than I'm willing to deal with. Unfortunately the
P4 Prescott "upgrade" doesn't seem like it's much of a performance
spike over the PIII; if I had more memory slots on my board, I would
wait for the next significant thing before upgrading...

Here are a couple links with Photoshop benchmarks.

http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/athlon64-fx53_15.html
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/pentiumm-780_18.html

Matrox makes video cards with PCI Express interfaces on them.
You aren't restricted to older motherboards, if you want to upgrade.

http://www.matrox.com/mga/workstation/digital_design/products/pseries/p650_pcie.cfm

I don't know how long these have been around.
Matrox P65-MDDE128 Millenium P650 PCI-Express 128MB DDR $225

The 945P and 955X boards support dual core Intel processors,
and the pricing on the processors is a bit better than AMD.

P5LD2 Deluxe 945P (2xPCIx16 + 3xPCI) $172
P5ND2 Sli Deluxe Nvidia (2xPCIx16 + 3xPCI) $225
P5WD2 Premium 955X (2xPCIx16 + 3xPCI) $209
Pentium D 820 Dual 2.8GHz $255
Pentium D 830 Dual 3.0GHz $319
Pentium D 840 Dual 3.2GHz $539
Pentium XE 840 Dual 3.2Ghz HT $999

You could put a dual core board together for $172+$319+$225 = $716
(Ram not included. 4x512MB DDR2-667 Corsair ValueSelect 4x$55=$220).

Photoshop can use both cores, so the system should be a
bit faster. By calculation, your $936 base system would give
you about a 200 second PS7bench.

The only weak link is PCI slots. It is hard to find boards with
a decent set of PCI slots - I presume Intel limited the number
of chip selects on the chipset. On the Athlon64/X2 dual core side,
the PCI Express boards tend to have 3 PCI as well. Here is an
example of an Athlon64 non-SLI board with 4 PCI slots, implying
the Nvidia Ultra chipset might make boards with more PCI slots
possible.

http://www.msicomputer.com/product/p_spec.asp?model=K8N_Neo4_Platinum&class=mb

Paul
 
Back
Top