Outlook 2003

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
G

Guest

I don't know why Outlook 2003 can't use Word 2002 as e-mail editor and there
has no notice to user before upgrade. No I can't use Word 2002 as email
editior and I can't afford to buy Office 2003 yet. Can anyone give some
advice please. Not happy Tony
 
Tony, you wrote on Thu, 15 Dec 2005 15:52:02 -0800:
I don't know why Outlook 2003 can't use Word 2002 as e-mail editor and there
has no notice to user before upgrade. No I can't use Word 2002 as email
editior and I can't afford to buy Office 2003 yet. Can anyone give some
advice please. Not happy Tony
Click to expand...

Outlook and Word must be installed in the same version to use Word as
mail editor! You also need to upgrade Word.
 
I don't know why Outlook 2003 can't use Word 2002 as e-mail editor and there
has no notice to user before upgrade. No I can't use Word 2002 as email
editior and I can't afford to buy Office 2003 yet. Can anyone give some
advice please. Not happy Tony
Click to expand...

Well, since we know that Word 2002 cannot be used as the editor for
Outlook 2003, my advice would be to try using Outlook 2003's editor.
It works remarkably well for a whole lot of us. If you absolutely
*have* to use Word as your editor, you'll have to revert to Outlook
2002 until you can obtain Word 2003 or Office 2003.
 
Tony said:
I don't know why Outlook 2003 can't use Word 2002 as e-mail editor
and there has no notice to user before upgrade. No I can't use Word
2002 as email editior and I can't afford to buy Office 2003 yet. Can
anyone give some advice please. Not happy Tony
Click to expand...

It's true. The versions of Word and Outlook must match in order to avail
yourself of the Office integration. However, the entire Office suite is
usually only slightly more expensive that buying Outlook alone. You can
find cheaper versions on eBay or, if you qualify, you can but Office Student
and Teacher Edition, usually about US $50-100 less than Office Standard.
 
Back
Top