BIG assumption about logic-based.
You're right, this annoys me too sometimes.
On the other hand, once I figured it out, its behavior is logical. If
somebody sends to address B, I often like to answer them from that
address, instead of using the default. (a) it's usually less
confusing to them, and (b) sometimes they are writing to a "throwaway"
address (like the one I use here in this group), and the communication
is just a one-time thing, they don't need my default address.
And if this one-time contact gets infected by a spamming virus, then
they don't have my default address and I can just dump the throwaway.
I did this several times last year. My default address is now getting
more spam than the throwaway.
But it would be so easy to make this a user choice.
Steven
Thanks for the reply - but shouldn't I be able to pre-
determine the reply to all sender account instead of
having to chek the random choice of Outlook? I'm making
a big assumption that Outlook follows LOGIC-based
reasoning.
Can I control this automatically?
Thanks,
Paul
--
Steve M - (e-mail address removed) (remove dirt for reply)
Ecclesiastes 9-11: 'speed does not always win the race, nor
strength the battle' ...
Damon Runyon: ... 'but that's the way to bet them'