Outlook 2000 wish they had never changed it

  • Thread starter Thread starter George Hester
  • Start date Start date
G

George Hester

It is so clean works perfectly. Everything just rolls along like it is skating on veneer. One thing I like about it that later
versions of Outlook lack. And that is the color coding in the Replys. Reply once it's blue thrice it's red 4 tmes its gold
it's so cool. And it is quick. I really appreciate clicking Reply to a e-mail message and have the new e-mail open in 5
secs or less. Outlook 2002 took about 20 secs and Outlook 2003 could take 2 minutes or more.

Well progress what would we do without it? W/r to Oulook probably have more time in the day.
 
Outlook 2003 works instantaneously for me. Must be just you, George.

--
Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]

Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. Due to
the (insert latest virus name here) virus, all mail sent to my personal
account will be deleted without reading.

After furious head scratching, George Hester asked:

| It is so clean works perfectly. Everything just rolls along like it
| is skating on veneer. One thing I like about it that later
| versions of Outlook lack. And that is the color coding in the
| Replys. Reply once it's blue thrice it's red 4 tmes its gold
| it's so cool. And it is quick. I really appreciate clicking Reply
| to a e-mail message and have the new e-mail open in 5
| secs or less. Outlook 2002 took about 20 secs and Outlook 2003 could
| take 2 minutes or more.
|
| Well progress what would we do without it? W/r to Oulook probably
| have more time in the day.
 
Back
Top