newby. Why are these values defined as they are

  • Thread starter Thread starter Claire
  • Start date Start date
C

Claire

I'm reading through some source code written by microsoft to show examples
of porting serial comms to .net.

Anyone who has written comms will know the following constants well.

Can anyone explain why the programmer chose the various variable types and
why some have been initialized so differently in the declaration.

Thanks

internal const int GENERIC_READ = unchecked((int) 0x80000000);

internal const int GENERIC_WRITE = 0x40000000;


internal static readonly IntPtr INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE = new IntPtr(-1);

internal static readonly IntPtr NULL = IntPtr.Zero;
 
I'm not for certain on all of these, but here are my guesses :)

internal const int GENERIC_READ = unchecked((int) 0x80000000);
internal const int GENERIC_WRITE = 0x40000000;
Click to expand...

Both are declared as constant int so that they cannot be modified after
declaration. internal means that the members are only accessible to types
within the same assembly.

The unchecked keyword turns of runtime bounds-checking I believe. You may
want to investigate this further.

Also, the 0x notation indicates a hex constant.
internal static readonly IntPtr INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE = new IntPtr(-1);
Click to expand...

readonly means the variable can only be assigned to during the initial
declaration (or for an instance field, in the instance constructor of the
class that declares the variable).

This variable is probably used to check against handles returned from win32
api functions to make sure they are valid.

ie:
myHandle = someAPIFunction();
if (myHandle == INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE)
// error
internal static readonly IntPtr NULL = IntPtr.Zero;
Click to expand...

This delcares an empty (null) pointer. Similar to the INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE
variable, it is probably used to make sure that pointers are not null before
using them.

Hope this helps.
 
Back
Top