net mono

[Bhagat Gurtu]

Thanking you in prior order to receipt of advises but anyway it so is.

By way of my most important task, my employer has asked me to see it makes
a database with C#. According to some it whereupons that .NET has a
duality in the expression of the framework of Mono.

Is it that the framework of Mono can be applied similar to scope which be
of the framework of .NET 1.1?

What of the object tetherings?

Bhagat

 

[Jon Skeet [C# MVP]]

Thanking you in prior order to receipt of advises but anyway it so is.

By way of my most important task, my employer has asked me to see it makes
a database with C#. According to some it whereupons that .NET has a
duality in the expression of the framework of Mono.

Is it that the framework of Mono can be applied similar to scope which be
of the framework of .NET 1.1?

What of the object tetherings?

Not sure what you mean about the "object tetherings" but Mono is
another CLI implementation, just like .NET is. It doesn't have
everything that .NET has, but it *does* run on platforms other than
Windows (unlike .NET).

 

[Bhagat Gurtu]

Not sure what you mean about the "object tetherings" but Mono is
another CLI implementation, just like .NET is. It doesn't have
everything that .NET has, but it *does* run on platforms other than
Windows (unlike .NET).

Im thanking much for your kinds of informations.

Object tethering is principle that is organic to bytes all sitting in same
place but behinds of each other.

Bhagat

 

[Jon Skeet [C# MVP]]

Im thanking much for your kinds of informations.

Object tethering is principle that is organic to bytes all sitting in same
place but behinds of each other.

I think there must be some mistranslations going on somewhere. A google
search for "object tethering" finds only 16 hits, none of which is
about computing.

 

[Matt]

I think there must be some mistranslations going on somewhere. A google
search for "object tethering" finds only 16 hits, none of which is
about computing.

He means interfaces. I suspect he's using a translator to convert
whatever
the native language he uses is (Indian, I would imagine) to English.

I don't recall if mono supports the various database objects.

Matt

 

[Jon Skeet [C# MVP]]

He means interfaces. I suspect he's using a translator to convert
whatever
the native language he uses is (Indian, I would imagine) to English.

I don't recall if mono supports the various database objects.

Hmm... I'm not sure that interfaces really go with the description of
"bytes all sitting in the same place but behinds of each other". To be
honest, I can't think what that *does* mean...

 

[Mike]

Hmm... I'm not sure that interfaces really go with the description of
"bytes all sitting in the same place but behinds of each other". To be
honest, I can't think what that *does* mean...

Sounds like a Union to me - but I'm sure that's not what he's after...

 

[Jon Skeet [C# MVP]]

Sounds like a Union to me - but I'm sure that's not what he's after...

Yes, I wondered about unions. It's about as close as I can think of,
but I'm still not sure...

 

[Mike]

Yes, I wondered about unions. It's about as close as I can think of,
but I'm still not sure...

It sounds pretty damn cool though -- I think whatever it does, Object
Tethering should be in v. 4.0!!
I know whatever it is, many in upper management are going to be very
concerned about it

m

 

[Jacob]

Could it be a simple array?

 

[Frank Rizzo]

I think there must be some mistranslations going on somewhere. A google
search for "object tethering" finds only 16 hits, none of which is
about computing.

I am going to take a shot and say that he is thinking of object binding.