.Net 1.1 and .Net 2.0

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jason Huang
  • Start date Start date
J

Jason Huang

Hi,

We are in early stage of developing our applications using .Net 1.1,
I am thinking is it necessary for us to switch to .Net 2.0.
Thanks for advice.


Jason
 
It's not necessary because 1.1 is goot, tried and tested technology.

It may be desirable to take advantage of some of the 2.0 features,
especially C# language features and it may also be expensive to get all the
new Visual Studio licenses.

Those are the nutshell issues.


--
Bob Powell [MVP]
Visual C#, System.Drawing

Ramuseco Limited .NET consulting
http://www.ramuseco.com

Find great Windows Forms articles in Windows Forms Tips and Tricks
http://www.bobpowell.net/tipstricks.htm

Answer those GDI+ questions with the GDI+ FAQ
http://www.bobpowell.net/faqmain.htm

All new articles provide code in C# and VB.NET.
Subscribe to the RSS feeds provided and never miss a new article.
 
Bob Powell said:
It's not necessary because 1.1 is goot, tried and tested technology.

It may be desirable to take advantage of some of the 2.0 features,
especially C# language features and it may also be expensive to get all
the new Visual Studio licenses.

Those are the nutshell issues.


--
Bob Powell [MVP]
Visual C#, System.Drawing

Ramuseco Limited .NET consulting
http://www.ramuseco.com

Find great Windows Forms articles in Windows Forms Tips and Tricks
http://www.bobpowell.net/tipstricks.htm

Answer those GDI+ questions with the GDI+ FAQ
http://www.bobpowell.net/faqmain.htm

All new articles provide code in C# and VB.NET.
Subscribe to the RSS feeds provided and never miss a new article.

It also depends on your target deployment. If your app will need to run on
machines with either 1.1 or 2.0 and you can't mandate that they install the
2.0 redist, then you'll need to go for 1.1 because 2.0 binaries will not run
on the 1.1 framework

Regards

Richard Blewett - DevelopMentor
http://www.dotnetconsult.co.uk/weblog
http://www.dotnetconsult.co.uk
 
Back
Top