Today kurttrail commented courteously on the subject at hand
Seriously, MS under the present regime, isn't
consumer-friendly, or working in the LONG-TERM interests of
its shareholders.
Yes, that is correct. Which is why the market is treating M$
so badly. But, wouldn't you think that 100 billionaire Bill
the Gates, whether he gives a shit for his stockholders or
not, would try to fix the company for altruistic reasons -
like getting back to a 150-250 billionaire?
Most companies, particularly American companies, seem to have
lost their way between short-term, mid-term, and long-term
financial health through improved quality and improved "exceed
the customer's expectations" for innovation and features.
Instead, they attempt to cut back and lay off to get
profitable. It doesn't work.
So, M$ isn't likely to get back to its halcyon days until the
perception by its customers gets back to "gee whiz, this is
neat stuff produced by a neat company, I'll buy more" instead
of using predatory marketing techniques to force competitors
out-of-business.
Bill the Gates is just now getting around to the idea that
anti-malware is a big industry but as usual, he is using 100
mega ton nuclear missles to swat flies and his software will
be forever in beta. He also thinks that M$ knows something
about graphics but has begun to sell photo editing apps to the
digital camera newbies with no real clue as to what the
graphics editor industry is all about, nor is M$ able to
predict where the digital camera market is going.
Which goes to my previous statement that M$ has /never/
written and sold anything truly innovative. And, the silly
shit in Windoze that has been there since 1.0 to 2.0 to 3.0 to
95 to 98 to 2000 to ME to NT to XP is still there. If you want
to control your system, you can't get there through Windoze
GUI, you need utility software, hiddle DOS-style utilities,
Registry hacks, Powertools, and 3rd party utilities. How can a
guy as brilliant as Bill the Gates not understand these simple
facts. Karen's Korner, an excellent site, wouldn't even need
to exist if M$ did its job correctly the first time.
M$ had one more chance when it completely rewrote XP for SP2
but fixed nothing. So, I have little faith in Vista being
ground-breaking software nor Longhorn. And, I have little
faith that either will come within years of their release
target.
Which brings us back full-circle to M$'s lack of stockholder
value awareness: if you can't get your new product(s) out on-
time and spend countless millions and consume thousands of
humans in a vain attempt at beating a new product into
submission, you're unlikely to be able to being it to market
with costs low enough to generate high profits. Good thing the
market really isn't competitive, huh?
Have a good one!