G
Guest
Hi,
I develop access solutions more then decade; those in the subject events in
bound form could reduce the programming term a lot. (I had DB (in bio/medical
environment) with ~700000 records with growth of ~5000 per week (now in
transition to SQLSVR)).
1. DuplicateKey- bound form level, will fire when duplicate problem due key
problem rise, it will let u know which exact key's is cause the violation.
2. Validate: form and field level (bound and unbound), let u logically
validate the content of field/ form before try to deal with the underlying
data storing.
3. Solve the cause to problem: Other user access the DB… (When there is no
one else!) When use multiply tables in single parent child database (it
enforce rewriting the entire screen unbound= a lot of wasting programming
time).
response: (e-mail address removed) (Amichai Feigenboim)
----------------
This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the
suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I
Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this
link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then
click "I Agree" in the message pane.
http://www.microsoft.com/office/com...31e5b3&dg=microsoft.public.access.formscoding
I develop access solutions more then decade; those in the subject events in
bound form could reduce the programming term a lot. (I had DB (in bio/medical
environment) with ~700000 records with growth of ~5000 per week (now in
transition to SQLSVR)).
1. DuplicateKey- bound form level, will fire when duplicate problem due key
problem rise, it will let u know which exact key's is cause the violation.
2. Validate: form and field level (bound and unbound), let u logically
validate the content of field/ form before try to deal with the underlying
data storing.
3. Solve the cause to problem: Other user access the DB… (When there is no
one else!) When use multiply tables in single parent child database (it
enforce rewriting the entire screen unbound= a lot of wasting programming
time).
response: (e-mail address removed) (Amichai Feigenboim)
----------------
This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the
suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I
Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this
link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then
click "I Agree" in the message pane.
http://www.microsoft.com/office/com...31e5b3&dg=microsoft.public.access.formscoding