David said:
In other words. You don't understand Constitional Law either. The
First Admendment is not an Absolutte Law.
In practice, you would be correct, however, as written, it is very
absolute.
"Congress shall *make* *no* *law* respecting an establishment of
religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the
freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably
to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of
grievances."
But I rested on my 1st Amendment rights as they are practiced today, not
the principle behind which the words actually stand for, according to my
belief.
There are restrictions on
it. Including Resposible speech. The 1st does not allow you to yell
"Movie in a crowded firwhouse"( or, is that the other wasy around??

). Nor, does it allow you you to misrepresent yourself as a
source of (false) legal information.
I told the truth about the workings of MS's policies, told the OP that
the decision is his, and I *never* *ever* gave him any legal advice,
though I have, on other occasions, given my personal opinion about what
I believe certain laws & court decision mean to me.
I *challenge* anyone to "sue me," or turn me in to my local prosecutor,
if they believe otherwise, because I am a man of my words, and I stand
proudly behind them, and will vigorously defend them with every ounce of
my being, in any venue, at any time. I will *never* "run away" from my
words.
--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.kurttrail.com
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"