D
Dave Tek
We lost our network admin a few weeks ago and a couple of us desktop
support folks are trying to take up the slack. We are having PST
problems with domain users on P4 desktops, 512MB DDR, Win2K with
Office 2003 installed (same thing with Office 2001 SR1). Updated and
scanned for malware. Outlook is configured to an Exchange server (not
the Enterprise version, and definitely under a strain).
Several users recently created new PSTs because their primary PST was
getting too large. They created the new files and populated them with
some folders and their respective contents. All was well until they
logged off for the night. Next day, the new PSTs were visible in the
Folder View pane, but could not be accessed.
Through trial and error, we have noticed today that if by following
these steps, we can get a working PST:
1. Create a new .PST in the default location.
2. Create a new folder in that .PST.
3. Populate the folder with at least one expendable item (Warning: The
message will be lost. At this point, if you close Outlook and then
reopen it, the folder and contents are still accessible, as long as
you don't log off or reboot.)
4. Do a Restart. You will encounter an error saying the new .PST
can't be found and an Explorer-style dialog box will open. Click on
the 'OPEN' button, and then click 'OK'. You will see another error
message across the screen saying 'Unable to Display The Folder...'.
5. Do a full shutdown. On restart, the .PST you created in step 1
above will be accessible again, but the folder and message will be
gone.
6. Recreate the subfolder and populate with another non-critical
message.
7. Do a full shutdown. Restart the PC. Open Outlook and the new .PST
will be intact along with the folder and message.
I haven't had time to play with different scenarios, like what happens
if I add folders or messages to my now seemingly persistent .PST file.
I fully expect to be able to duplicate these steps on identical PCs
with the same results, but tomorrow will tell.
Has anyone else had any experience with this situation? Your help
would be very much appreciated!
-Dave
support folks are trying to take up the slack. We are having PST
problems with domain users on P4 desktops, 512MB DDR, Win2K with
Office 2003 installed (same thing with Office 2001 SR1). Updated and
scanned for malware. Outlook is configured to an Exchange server (not
the Enterprise version, and definitely under a strain).
Several users recently created new PSTs because their primary PST was
getting too large. They created the new files and populated them with
some folders and their respective contents. All was well until they
logged off for the night. Next day, the new PSTs were visible in the
Folder View pane, but could not be accessed.
Through trial and error, we have noticed today that if by following
these steps, we can get a working PST:
1. Create a new .PST in the default location.
2. Create a new folder in that .PST.
3. Populate the folder with at least one expendable item (Warning: The
message will be lost. At this point, if you close Outlook and then
reopen it, the folder and contents are still accessible, as long as
you don't log off or reboot.)
4. Do a Restart. You will encounter an error saying the new .PST
can't be found and an Explorer-style dialog box will open. Click on
the 'OPEN' button, and then click 'OK'. You will see another error
message across the screen saying 'Unable to Display The Folder...'.
5. Do a full shutdown. On restart, the .PST you created in step 1
above will be accessible again, but the folder and message will be
gone.
6. Recreate the subfolder and populate with another non-critical
message.
7. Do a full shutdown. Restart the PC. Open Outlook and the new .PST
will be intact along with the folder and message.
I haven't had time to play with different scenarios, like what happens
if I add folders or messages to my now seemingly persistent .PST file.
I fully expect to be able to duplicate these steps on identical PCs
with the same results, but tomorrow will tell.
Has anyone else had any experience with this situation? Your help
would be very much appreciated!
-Dave