B
Bill
Assuming I'll eventually need some code, I've
chosen to post this forum. For starters, I would
appreciate a few suggestive words of wisdom
as regards field maintenance of split configurations.
First, what seems to work well for marking the
backend mdb as regards compatibility? My first
thought is to somehow use the database properties
to mark the database at a given level. Then, when
the front-end mde opens, I can check the level of
the database and perform any required updates
to table definitions, etc.. and then mark the mdb
to the updated level.
I've never had an occasion to perform table
definition updates from code nor write anything
into the database property sheet. So, I thought
it best here to ask about what scheme is generally
accepted as the norm.
Any guidance will be appreciated.
Thanks,
Bill
chosen to post this forum. For starters, I would
appreciate a few suggestive words of wisdom
as regards field maintenance of split configurations.
First, what seems to work well for marking the
backend mdb as regards compatibility? My first
thought is to somehow use the database properties
to mark the database at a given level. Then, when
the front-end mde opens, I can check the level of
the database and perform any required updates
to table definitions, etc.. and then mark the mdb
to the updated level.
I've never had an occasion to perform table
definition updates from code nor write anything
into the database property sheet. So, I thought
it best here to ask about what scheme is generally
accepted as the norm.
Any guidance will be appreciated.
Thanks,
Bill