Carl said:
What is a low level format and how does it differ from regular formatting a
hard drive.
Thanks
Low level format records the physical tracks, sectors and sector
interleave on the disk surface and optionally marks any surface defects
as unusable sectors.
A disk format using the operating system erases any existing address
tables, verifies that all sectors can be read reliably, marking
unreadable sectors as bad blocks (unless a quick format is performed,
then this function is skipped), and creates a new address table. It does
not erase any existing data on the data sectors themsleves, which is why
data recovery tools can sometimes recover information from an OS
formatted disk.
A low level format is done at the factory on modern drives and you
cannot perform it on them yourself. You can use a zero-fill utility
which writes zeros to every sector on the disk (which does erase data
from sectors) but this is not the same as a low level format, even
though some people mistakenly call it that. It is not a low level format
because it does not create the physical tracks, sectors nor sector
interleaves, it simply writes zeros to existing sectors.
In the old days of MFM, RLL, EDSI drives you had to perform a low level
format of a new disk before partitioning and formatting it with the
operating system. This was done by using DEBUG.COM or DEBUG.EXE (a
machine language program included in DOS) to load a format program from
the ROM on the disk controller adaptor card. In addition to manually
setting the number of tracks, sectors and sector interleave you could
also enter in bad sectors listed in a "bad track table" or "surface
defect list" usually pasted onto the drive case by the manufacturer or
supplied in a printout when it was QA tested at the factory. Since it
was fairly random as to where a low level format would create the first
sector of the first track on the spinning disk and all subsequent tracks
and sectors were then located based upon the location of the first
sector of the first track, it was a common practice back then to perform
a low level format over and over again on a disk with a large number of
surface defects, hoping that some surface defects would by chance fall
into the gaps between the beginning and ending of the tracks and the end
result being less storage area lost due to bad sectors. Remember, this
was back in the days of 10 to 60 MB (that's right, mere MegaBytes, not
GigaBytes!) of storage on these disks, so lost disk space due to bad
sectors was a big deal.
Steve